There will be no knee-jerk reaction here to the future of head coach Gerard Gallant, who has steered the team to 110- and 107-point seasons in his two years behind the bench, with one trip to the conference finals as notches in his belt. There should be no rush to judgment here and there won’t be from Drury, who operates methodically and without knee-jerk emotion.
Gallant has his faults: He is probably too stubborn, he is probably too loyal to veterans and he may not make in-game adjustments as quickly as needed. He also presided over a team that came up with three no-shows in the final five games of a playoff series. If the team had a disastrous fortnight, the coach is part of the team.
But sometimes you don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone. The Rangers marquee stars raved about their coach last season after he succeeded David Quinn. Constant flux is not what this organization needs. It would be folly to dismiss Gallant in order to hire a recyclable, just because.
The roster needs reconstruction and that won’t be easy to do given the no-move clauses owned by Artemi Panarin, Mika Zibanejad, Chris Kreider, Jacob Trouba and Vincent Trocheck and the tight cap squeeze Drury will confront this offseason.
The Rangers, as I have been saying for years, need a line with a lockdown mentality and matchup capability. But I am not sure how Drury would go about that while locked in with Zibanejad, Trocheck and Filip Chytil down the middle. Not one is a checking center. Maybe, and this is probably indicative of the type of knee-jerk reaction Drury and the staff should avoid, but maybe this is the time to revisit the notion of moving Chytil to the wing on either of the top two units. See why I am a columnist?
I cannot even begin to explain Artemi Panarin’s series.