Kukla's Korner

KK Members Blog

The NHL and NHLPA are not getting anywhere!

The NHL and NHLPA are not getting anywhere, so you both have to stop and read this.  l will be a mediator for now or maybe the new Union replacement soon.

Who said the NHL can’t replace players' and still be successful.  They did it after the 2004/2005 lockout when they replaced 241 players' that did not return.  They either left through retirement or just stayed away after the last lockout.  All I need is 51% of the players to join me, that is what is needed to be able to play this season.  First we have to get some work done to show that we mean business.  I know that there are players' that just want to play but don't want to be seen as a union buster because they would be looked down at.  Well guys I am a union guy that see's the NHLPA not going anywhere and I'm here to help.

First I will start off by giving the NHLPA the truth that they don't want the players' to really know.  Donald is still talking about the 24% the players' lost in the 2004/2005 lockout and the truth is he does not mention what they have gained since the lockout.  I was reading the paper the other day and it is talking about how Joffrey Lupul has seen his salary rise 373% that is an average of 53% a season since the 2006 season.  Donald does sell himself to the players' on what he has done for baseball and yes that is the number one or two sport in the United States.  In some states hockey falls to maybe 7th or 8th behind Football, Baseball, Basketball, Golf, NASCAR, Soccer, Bowling and even Darts.  I have got to hand it to you Mr. Fehr, I don't know how you have the players' convinced in believing in you at the expense of the season being lost and the 241 players that may not be playing next season.  My message is to all players'.  My union does care about every player on every team and we will get a contract done together as one.

Now for the owners.  We first have to sign an agreement that I have the Collective Bargaining Rights for the players' so we can work together to get 700 players' on side we should get the 241 that may not return next season, I'm not a lawyer but I think legally if we get 51% they all are bound to their contracts and yes that's where my tweaking of your proposal comes in.  It is NO fault of the players' and some responsible owners, that lately there have been some big contracts signed.  Why should everyone pay the price of a lockout, my first tweak is to honor all signed contracts and I will mention more tweaks below.

Both sides do agree that there are problems.  That means we have to move to the future and the damage that has been done in the past has to stay in the past.  Never bring that up again, LET IT GO and everyone has to start working towards the future of the game.  My union and the NHL can start working on that while my members are on the ice.  I will reiterate again that it's not their fault from the past and I will guarantee no strike as long as you guarantee no more lockout for the rest of this season.

Now for my union to fix the future: From what I am hearing from the players' I want all old contracts to be honored fully and a 50/50 split from revenue.  Our new union will start playing hockey again on 11/11/2012, and a full season of 82 games can still be played.  I was thinking of just doing a two year deal at the start just to show the players' that my Union is the way to go and I’m sure that most will be happy.  I know we can't keep everyone happy on both sides but a good majority is always nice.

A note to the players'.  Do yourselves a favor and google the baseball strike of 1994.  After reading this material you may see why the owners don't want to deal with someone like this. Now ask your Union leader Mr. Donald Fehr if he has any regrets or made any mistakes as being a Union leader and I think he will come out with the same answer as Adolf Hitler and the Grinch that stole Christmas, I'm still upset at the Grinch LOL..  NO REGRETS, I could be wrong and he will say the 1994 strike.  If that’s the case then WHY is he doing it again?  Now you may be saying it's a lockout not a strike and you’re right but he took the dreams from the players' to win the world series in 1994.  Also Montreal never did recover from that strike and they are now the Nationals in Washington.

Here is something that I would like you to think about.  Remember Winnipeg, earlier this past season they wanted to change things up to move the Jets into a better situation for there division and common sense says move north, what were the players' thinking?  I'm telling you this is a big power thing for Donald.  This guy loves the power he has and will use it at any expense of the members (players') even if you're out for a season or two.  Donald lose the power trip and get these players' back on the ice where they want to be.

Think of your 241 brothers that may have played their last game last season and for some not by their choice and be fair to them.  They are a big part of why you all are making a great living in the NHL today so please think about them as well as yourselves in the decisions you are making.

Just STOP and think.  How has this negotiations been working in your favor so far?  With this question I am talking to both sides!!!

My credentials include 15 years' of experience as a Union Business Agent and 8 of those years as President.  This being said, I know how to get the job done..

I am Peter Montgomery from the NationalHockeyLeaguePlayersAssociation.com  and yes I do own this domain name.

cc. All NHL teams, NHLPA, some Players, all 150 player agents and some media that should get the real truth out.

Filed in: NHL Talk, NHLPA, | KK Members Blog | Permalink


J.J. from Kansas's avatar

My goodness this is dumb.

I could be wrong and he will say the 1994 strike.  If that’s the case then WHY is he doing it again?  Now you may be saying it’s a lockout not a strike and you’re right but he took the dreams from the players’ to win the world series in 1994.  Also Montreal never did recover from that strike and they are now the Nationals in Washington.

Yes, I am saying it’s a lockout not a strike and I am right, but the argument that there wasn’t a world series in 1994 has precisely dick to do with what’s going on right now.

Also, Montreal didn’t support the Expos, Washington is a much stronger market.

I’d go on and on and on and on here, but this whole thing is garbage.

Posted by J.J. from Kansas on 10/30/12 at 11:23 AM ET

tkfergy's avatar

Is there a way to make it so brand new members can’t post on the member’s blog? As in you have to comment X amount of time before you are allowed to?

Posted by tkfergy on 10/30/12 at 12:18 PM ET

J.J. from Kansas's avatar

I’m not exactly opposed to brand new people posting in the members’ blog without commenting first. Heck, I don’t even have a problem with it when people post things that I think are grossly naive, ill-informed, and just generally disagreeable. 

The inclusion of a domain name at the end does make this feel a little spammy though.

Posted by J.J. from Kansas on 10/30/12 at 12:38 PM ET

Paul's avatar

tkfergy, I could do that, but there are many long time readers of KK who are not members and then decide to post something, so they have to become a member and they would fall in the category you describe.

I do not edit the post from the member, unless it is for a format problem, but I do have the final say before the post goes live.

In the past, I have denied posts and will continue to do so, but in this case, the member is expressing his views.

Posted by Paul from Motown Area on 10/30/12 at 01:11 PM ET


Sounds just like something a Construction worker from Calgary who seems to take joy in cybersquatting the shitty domain name “nationalhockeyleagueplayersassociation.com” would come up with. Oh wait….”
Why would anyone be impressed by that?

Posted by MJPalis from Annapolis, MD on 10/30/12 at 01:29 PM ET

WingsFaninCO's avatar

Should have brought my waders since the BS in this post is piled pretty deep.

My credentials include 15 years’ of experience as a Union Business Agent and 8 of those years as President.  This being said, I know how to get the job done..

I feel sorry for any union you have been involved with, since you obviously don’t know your as$ from a hole in the ground. 

Either that or we just got trolled.

Posted by Paul from Motown Area on 10/30/12 at 01:11 PM ET

A good policy, especially considering that most of your readership will tear apart anything that is as clearly delusional as this piece.

Posted by WingsFaninCO on 10/30/12 at 01:49 PM ET

Peter10's avatar

Congrats but only for having the balls to put your name on it as this blog has it all from uninformed, unrealistic to uninteresting.

Posted by Peter10 from Germany on 10/30/12 at 03:01 PM ET


The above post by Peter Montgomery has nothing to do with what is necessary to go forward with the National Hockey League as an elite sport as I see it.First of all there are too many players not worthy of playing at this level.Second of all there are too many teams not worthy of a franchise,just look at the numbers.Contraction not expansion is necessary to stem the tide of red ink and to evenly and fairly spread the wealth among the elite players and teams that comprise the world’s finest sport.Arguing for the sake of 200 players who may lose their jobs is akin to some sort of bailout Obama style or pro sport entitlement.As a Bruin’s fan I am really not interested in proceeds from my ticket being sent to Columbus or Phoenix.I have seen enough of my paychecks over the years being spread around to the great unwashed.It is an honor to play in the NHL and it should be an honor as well to own a franchise.The honor as been tarnished over the years by the ownership’s over zealous greed and marketing strategy.Once these two issues are confronted and dealt with accordingly only then can there be a real dialogue and fair and equitable compensation for both the employee and employer.

Posted by wensink on 10/30/12 at 04:00 PM ET

WingsFaninCO's avatar

Posted by wensink on 10/30/12 at 04:00 PM ET

Tim Thomas?  Is that you?

But on a serious note, the league CAN NOT contract. Not only would they have to buy the owners out of their ownership rights and all the value associated with ownership (hundreds of millions per team), they would also have to compensate arenas for the leases (for many years to come).  This doesn’t even begin to address the lawsuits from municipalities (and possibly businesses?) that suffer damages from the sudden removal of a team from an area and the sudden drop in associated activity.  The costs, headaches, and legal ramifications make contraction a logistics nightmare

Posted by WingsFaninCO on 10/30/12 at 04:12 PM ET

tkfergy's avatar

Posted by Paul from Motown Area on 10/30/12 at 01:11 PM ET

Fair point I read for a while before I signed up… and I only comment in 1/20 posts that I read unless it’s a LB

Posted by tkfergy on 10/31/12 at 01:01 PM ET

Add a Comment

Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.

Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.

Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.


Notify me of follow-up comments?


Most Recent Blog Posts

About KK Members Blog

If you want to be a hockey writer, be our special guest!

We’re giving the KK community a chance to add their two-bits. Sign up to be a KK member, write your piece, and be heard right here on one of the Internet’s most visited hockey news websites.


How to Post

More details here. But basically, just use the posting page to write anything you like on what's going on in the hockey news or your analysis of the NHL and your favorite team.

We only ask that you avoid profanity, and that you're careful to credit your sources -- news media or other bloggers -- and provide links to those other sites when appropriate.

Need help? Check out our help page.