from Kerry Fraser of TSN,

Throughout my entire officiating career I felt it was important that I own my mistakes by offering a mea culpa to the game participants on the spot and even a public admission if asked by the media later.

That courtesy extended beyond just perceived errors or controversial calls to also provide an explanation of any decision made on the ice from my perspective. Reporters always gather quotes from an emotional player or coach in their post-game interview. It would only be fair and balanced if they heard from the official that made the decision.

The officials’ ability to communicate in a public forum was sealed off once the league restricted media access to their officials and placed a gag on the referees and linesmen from issuing public statements. Whenever the league deems it necessary to provide an explanation on any hot-button game-related issue, a statement is typically prepared and released by the public relations department.

During the playoffs, when a heightened focus is generally placed on the referees and linesmen, all post-game statements are issued through the series supervisor after he consults with the officiating crew. If it is a major controversy the PR department will prepare the statement.

While I would prefer to personally explain my perspective on a play, I completely understand why the league must restrict access to their officials. Some officials I worked with were very media savvy while the majority was not. Inaccurate or inappropriate statements could lead to further damage control for the league.

On rare occasions, the senior vice-president of hockey operations or the officiating department has issued a statement to provide clarification of a play or infraction that was ruled upon incorrectly.

read on