Kukla's Korner

Goal Line Report

Not Terrible, but Not Great Either

That would be the exact way to describe the New York Rangers’ play in their Game 1 2-1 overtime loss to the Washington Capitals.

The Blueshirts grabbed a 1-0 lead in the third when defenseman Matt Gilroy scored his first career playoff goal. Unfortuantely, the Capitals washed that out late in the third period when Alex Ovechkin forced one in at the side of the net passed a helpless Henrik Lundqvist.

This was definitely a game that the Rangers’ could have won by at least a 1-0 score. The team had done a terrific job of shutting down the Capitals’ big guns until Ovechkin tied it and Alex Semin won it in overtime.

With that said, this Blueshirts’ hockey team did not generate enough offense. Sure, the team took 25 shots but not enough of them were of the quality variety, which is something that the team will need to change going forward if they want to win this series.

The team got solid performances from Lundqvist (31 saves on 33 shots) along with the team’s defense. The defense broke up a lot of plays, blocked a lot of shots, were physcial when they had to be and did everything they could to give their offense a chance to get it going.

It’s only one game folks. In fact, it was a game that the Rangers could/should have won.

It is time to look forward to Game 2 and hope for a different outcome.

Filed in: | Goal Line Report | Permalink
  Tags: alex+ovechkin, alexander+semin, henrik+lundqvist, matt+gilroy, new+york+rangers, washington+capitals


Thag's avatar

A couple of hit crossbars, a couple missed open nets… Caps should have won this one 4 or 5 to 1.  They won’t be missing those on Friday.  Should be a short series.

Posted by Thag from DC on 04/14/11 at 10:49 AM ET


The Caps improved depth at C and on D will shine thru as this series goes on. Rangers are playing their top D pairing way too much. Even so Boudreau has to do a better job getting his top line away from Girardi/Staal on home ice.

Posted by flacco5 on 04/14/11 at 12:06 PM ET


No sure about this one sentiment:

In fact, it was a game that the Rangers could/should have won.

Should have won?  IMO that is a pretty big stretch.  I think the team played well enough to be in it, but if this was a game they should have won, how poor does the team have to play in the offensive zone to say the Rangers should not have won?

Posted by matt from nova on 04/14/11 at 12:26 PM ET

Add a Comment

Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.

Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.

Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.


Notify me of follow-up comments?


Most Recent Blog Posts

About Goal Line Report

Patrick has a tremendous passion for hockey. Besides covering the Rangers and the NHL for Kukla's Korner, you can also find Patrick's work over at Sportsnet.ca, The Red Light District Hockey Blog, NHL Home Ice, and Liam Maguire's Ultimate Hockey web site.

Prior to writing for the above mentioned outlets, you could find Patrick's musings at hockey web sites/outlets such as TheHockeyNews.com, TheFourthPeriod.com, Spector's Hockey, Hokeja Vestnesis, Blueshirt Bulletin, SNYRangersBlog.com and many more.

For questions, comments and hip checks, feel free to e-mail Patrick at patrickhoffman3530@gmail.com.

haberistanbul evden eve nakliyat affenspiele.net mimispiele.comgebze evden eve nakliyat solitaire oyna
turkce.yurtdisi-fx.com agario.surf agario paper.io