Kukla's Korner

The Sabres Observer

Flyers Delivering Dose Of Reality

We’re hearing a lot about how the Sabres have yet to play their best game in their series against the Flyers.  Despite not looking like gangbusters themselves, Philadelphia to varying degrees has been the better team in all three games. 

After their 4-2 win in Buffalo last night to gain a 2-1 lead in the series, it’s about time to accept the fact that this whole turn of events hasn’t been a coincidence.

For all the defensive schemes and systems that are out there, we all know that talent still usually prevails in a seven-game series.  Compared to the Flyers, the Sabres just don’t have enough.

Their number one center hasn’t scored a playoff goal in five years.  Look at Tim Connolly with Rob Niedermayer and Paul Gaustad as a comparison to Daniel Briere, Claude Giroux and Mike Richards.  Is it even close?  The Sabres top three up the middle combined for 30 goals this season.  Briere topped that on his own.

Three of the Flyers top defensemen have a combined 23 years of NHL experience.  Three of Buffalo’s top blueliners played in their first playoff game five days ago, and their top guy is in only his second season in the league.

The only advantage Buffalo has is goaltending, but being better in that department doesn’t seem to carry as much weight as it used to.  Nevertheless, the local media heading into the playoffs was harping on Ryan Miller to make a difference.

Briere said that Miller stole Game One, and I agree with him.  But with all due respect to Jaroslav Halak, asking your goalie to single-handedly win all or most of your playoff games nowadays is a tad bit unreasonable.

Too many fans and media folks harped on how the Flyers looked in March and early April.  They went 7-4-6 in the last month of the season and people called it a slump.  And that was without their stud defenseman.  Truthfully, they were and are a bad playoff matchup for the Sabres.  I’d personally have rather seen them play Boston or a Crosby-less Pittsburgh.

Lastly, there was a lot of talk about a perceived lack of energy in the crowd last night.  Having been in both buildings during this series, it’s safe to say that’s not just a perception.  The difference thus far in the noise levels between the Philly and Buffalo buildings has been like comparing a Metallica concert to the scene with your uncle butchering “Sweet Caroline” at a karaoke bar.

Taking on the personality of their hockey team, Sabres fans at HSBC Arena collectively didn’t bring their ‘A’ game last night.  Perhaps the Monday blues or another shot of winter took a little out of them.

Or maybe, somewhat numbed by a dose of reality, they’re just smart enough to realize what their team is up against.

Twitter: @DaveDavisHockey

Filed in: | The Sabres Observer | Permalink
 

Comments

Avatar

Carter has been moved to the wing and is centered by Giroux.  I get the point, but the author needs to be more informed.

Posted by ProjectMayhem on 04/19/11 at 01:11 PM ET

@DaveDavisHockey's avatar

No the author knew that but was briefly accuracy challenged.  Thanks for the justified hip check.

Posted by @DaveDavisHockey from Buffalo, NY on 04/19/11 at 01:24 PM ET

Avatar

I’m gonna have to disagree with this line:
“For all the defensive schemes and systems that are out there, we all know that talent still usually prevails in a seven-game series.  “

See Capitals, Washington 2009-2010 season.

Systems do win. Last year the Caps relied on talent alone to win games. Montreal played a solid system of hockey and shutdown the all-stars just enough to get by in a 7 game series.

Posted by dez on 04/19/11 at 01:36 PM ET

@DaveDavisHockey's avatar

Talent usually prevails, occasional upsets notwithstanding.  PHI & CHI didn’t need shutdown systems to reach the finals last yr.

Posted by @DaveDavisHockey from Buffalo, NY on 04/19/11 at 01:56 PM ET

Avatar

I was in attendance at the game on monday and am offended that some have said the crowd wasn’t loud enough.  The crowd cant cheer just to cheer.  They have to have REASONS! Other than the 10 minutes that we actually had a resemblance of a forecheck (thanks goose, gerbs, and grier) and the 2 goals we scored on rushes, there was absolutely no reason to cheer.  So i appreciate your opinions and hope we have more reasons tonight! GO SABRES!

Posted by Chris from Cheektowaga on 04/20/11 at 01:04 PM ET

Avatar

@Chris - I disagree. There’s a difference between cheering “for” something, and cheering a team “on.”  The Sabres players have time and again mentioned that crowd noise matters, that it can make a difference in a tight game where they’re getting tired and just need that last burst.  Too often, Sabres fans at HSBC have an attiftude that the team needs to prove something on the ice that night before cheers are warranted.  Honestly, hasn’t this team proven enough in the past few months? Shouldn’t we, as fans, try to give them that boost - even, and maybe ESPECIALLY - when they’re struggling, but still so close to getting that tying goal.

Just some thoughts…

Posted by Matty_Dubs on 04/20/11 at 05:35 PM ET

Add a Comment

Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.

Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.

Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.

Smileys

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Feed

Most Recent Blog Posts

About The Sabres Observer

Dave Davis has covered the Buffalo Sabres for various NHL accredited websites and newspapers since 2003.  He was the senior writer and Sabres correspondent for The Fourth Period, covered hockey for Western New York Sports and Leisure Magazine, and has had articles featured on NHL.com, FOX Sports, Yahoo Sports and in New York Sportscene.  Sabres news and notes can be found on his Twitter page.

 

 

Email: dd@kuklaskorner.com Twitter: [@DaveDavisHockey]