Kukla's Korner

The Malik Report

Red Wings-Bruins Game 2 wrap-up: Ye Old Self-Inflicted Learning Experience Wound

The hardest part of what I'm about to do in surveying the media's takes on the Red Wings' 4-1 loss to the Boston Bruins in Game 2 involves the fact that Claude Julien and the Bruins will likely receive oodles of credit for "adjusting," when the truth of the matter--to Red Wings fans like me,  happily professional and biased--is that the Wings' fans, players and media are all on the same page this morning (I'm sure Chris Osgood will say things we've all heard when he chats on Freep.com at 11 EDT).

What happened? What Mike Babcock told us happened. The Wings stopped playing like themselves and started playing like the Bruins, and from Jimmy Howard's puck-flickering dimwit play on out to Brendan Smith's attempts to scale Mount Chara to the terrible penalty-kill (why did you reunite Quincey and Smith, coach?) and power play (aggravating fans' nerves: Olczyk and McGuire gushing about the standard of officiating as the Wings let themselves get suckered)...

And I guess that's it. We can talk about how Franzen lost his hands when he went back to Easton gloves, that Alfredsson's been all defense and no offense, that Smith wasn't great, that Lashoff's terrible, that Glendening and Miller were surprisingly on the ice for 3 goals against, that the Kid Line looked intimidated, Nyquist hasn't meshed with Datsyuk, etc. etc. etc.

But what the *#$%@& are we supposed to give the Bruins credit for, other than encouraging the Wings to get in a knife fight with an alligator?

The Wings poked the Bruin. The Wings tried to play like the Bruins, and that's a recipe for disaster.

If anything was shocking, it was the thoroughness with which the Wings shot themselves in each and every toe, proceeded up their metatarsal bones with hammers, and eventually bludgeoned their own ankles, all after delicately removing their skates and socks.

On the morning of the Boston Marathon, when Detroit and Boston are reunited for one day with a strong sense of fraternal love, I hope that the Wings got on the plane...

And before they did (the team practices at 11 AM today), I hope that they gave themselves a good shake to make sure all the stupid was left on the runway.

We've seen this movie. It was called the 2013 and 2013-2014 regular seasons. And while Babcock likes to say that, "Sometimes you need to be reminded," I dunno if any of the Wings fans who watched the Bruins manhandle the Wings' brains and bodies on Sunday liked that reminder. It was silly. It was dumb. It was unnecessary.

If I was as lazy as I am tired, I'd say that we start here and stop here. I'm going to post the Wings YouTube Channel's post-game comments first instead of last, and it's not that the Wings didn't "get" that they have to play Detroit Red Wings hockey and not get into what Jimmy Howard calls, "BS out there, just play whistle to whistle."

It's that they did it anyway. They let the biggest bully on the playground egg them into getting the shit beat out of them. Here's James Russel Howard, discussing his brain fart first ("It happened")...

Kaptain Kronwall...

Mike Babcock, who addressed the Free Press's Helene St. James' and Detroit News's Ted Kulfan's questions succinctly, suggesting that next time around, the Wings need to prepare for the next game...

And St. James posted a clip of Daniel "The Romulan" Alfredsson talking about the Red Wings' poor breakouts and inability to skate the puck through the neutral zone assertively, nor to establish possession and control of the puck in the Bruins' end, especially on the power play (St. James also posted a clip of Howard's comments and

You don't need to watch Bob Wojnowski and Sean Baligian talk about the game on Fox 2's Sportsworks (though Jennifer Hammond's feature about the Wings' playoff beards is cute), you don't need to know what Mickey Redmond told WDIV's Bernie Smilovitz...

You can probably stop here if you want to, because I'm gonna put another three hours' worth of work in, but I guess all that will do is answer the, "What the Bruins thought about doing exactly what they wanted via a ton of help from their opponent" question.

The worst part was that the shift-disturbers ended up explaining what they were going to do prior to the game, including going after Brendan Smith, and then they did it.

It certainly wasn't Kevan Miller's return that empowered the Bruins to play the way they did. It was the Red Wings who empowered the Bruins to play their power game (awful sentence, I know), and then the beatings began.

With this series turning into an every-other-day affair tied 1-1, obviously coming out and taking Game 3 is huge, but unless we want to lament the fact that Milan Lucic was fined and not suspended, we're not going to be able to answer the question, "Can the Wings beat the Bruins and themselves?" (and perhaps the stupid standard of officiating that plagues the NHL's' 16 playoff teams) until Tuesday evening.

But the question does remain--if I may be vulgar--do the Wings want an ugly *#$%@& like Lucic and his teammates get away with this kind of thing? By playing, "Stop punching yourself?"

Maybe I'm a bad person and a bad blogger for refusing to give the Bruins credit for doing what they did so very well, but this is the playoffs, and I don't feel like playing a professional on the internet right now.

And now, we begin the post-mortem...The Bruins' press is just so ridiculous this morning that I've got 53 tabs open--thus far--so I'm just gonna go publication by publication and pick and choose if that's cool with you.

I appear to have picked wisely, because ESPN's Joe McDonald duly noted that the Bruins did exactly what they said they would prior to the game...

"I don't know if anyone wants to piss us off," Bruins forward Shawn Thornton said prior to Sunday's game. "It shouldn't matter. We've got to play our game no matter what they've got on the other side. That means bringing emotion and intensity. We've got to be physical but we've got to play the game too, so I don't think that changes. It's playoff time, we should just be playing our game.

"You don't need that. Everyone talks about it because of the way we're built that we play better when we're a little pissed off, but playoff hockey, if you can't get yourself going there's something wrong. You shouldn't need a ton of animosity to motivate yourself this time of year."

And the B's media went all "aww" regarding the fact that Milan Lucic apparently needed stitches after cutting his foot (one skate blade cut into the top of his other foot) slamming into the boards on a forechecking shift, and he returned in time to help Iginla score. "Aww." I do not feel similarly:

"I was 50/50 there a little bit," Lucic said. "I cut my foot up pretty good there with my own skate blade, but luckily I didn't get off. Kruger made a great play to me and Iggy made a great fake-shot pass and found me driving the net, so good thing I stayed on the ice and it ended up being a big goal to regain that two-goal lead."

Between periods, Lucic needed stitches to close the gash in his foot but it did not affect his game in the third period.

"A couple of stitches, but a long way from the heart, right?" Lucic said. "Add a little tape and aspirin to it and keep going."

And brain. Always a long way from the brain.

McDonald also noted Reilly Smith's comments regarding his brother's stupidity...

“He wouldn’t be the first guy I’d choose in the NHL to go against,” Reilly Smith said. “He should probably think twice next time.”

When asked if he was worried for his brother’s safety, Reilly said, “No, not too much. That’s the least of my worries right now.”

Brendan Smith did not speak with the media after the game, and Chara downplayed the situation as part of the game.

“Nothing really, it’s just playoff hockey,” Chara said.

And in addition to his Rapid Reaction and note about Kevan Miller's return to the B's blueline, he pointed out that call-up Justin Florek got quite the goal via a silver platter giveaway:

On Sunday, Florek and the Bruins took advantage of a Detroit miscue to gain a 1-0 lead at 7:28 of the first period. Red Wings goaltender Jimmy Howard came far out of the crease to play the puck and attempted to move it to Brendan Smith, but the puck ricocheted off the defenseman’s leg.

The puck came to Florek, who was in the right place at the right time, took a shot from the left faceoff circle and scored with Howard out of position.

“It felt great,” Florek said. “Just great to get the fans into it and get everyone going, especially the team. So I think it was a good start for us, and hopefully, we can carry that out through the rest of the series.”


“It was great for him,” Julien said. “It was also great for the team, I think, to give us that early lead and really get that confidence going, that energy that we were looking for. That was a big goal for us, so it was great to see him stay on it and react well and quick enough so that it ended up being a good goal for us.”

On to WEEI. whose DJ Bean praised the Lucic-Krejci-Iginla line's job done against the Sheahan and Glendening ones...

"We felt like we didn’t leave enough out there in the first game, and sometimes in a series it takes a little bit to get things going," Lucic said. "As this has gone on I think it got a little bit better today, but I think moving forward we still have to get better to get to the top of our game."


The Sheahan trio features three young players. Tatar and Nyquist, the line's wings, each stand under six feet and weigh 185 and 186 pounds, respectively. Lucic is 6-foot-3 and 235 pounds, while Iginla and 6-foot-1 and 210 pounds. If the B's are able to slow the Red Wings down the way they did on Sunday, Boston's power forwards can wear down Tatar and Nyquist over the course of a game.

(The Kid Line wasn't very good)

“I think they had the sense that they had to get going and they needed to produce and be a positive influence in this game, so they went right back at it and they scored a big goal for us,” Claude Julien said. “They’ve been a good line for us all year, and the biggest challenge for those guys is they’re going to be checked on a little bit tighter in the playoffs.

“They’ve got to battle through those situations and continue to be a real productive line for us. I thought tonight was better. Obviously the first game, they had a tough game, but I thought they bounced back well in this afternoon’s game.”

And Bean talked about Florek, the Bruins' in-flux personnel, the Bruins' penalty-kill, which is 8 for 8...

“Our guys just did a great job,” Claude Julien said. “David Krejci hasn’t killed much this year. He’s killed in the past and he’s been a good penalty killer. We’€™re, I guess, blessed with a lot of them this year, where we’re able to save David for the line following a penalty kill. But we need him now. He’s stepped up.

“Florek’s another guy that’s killed penalties in Providence and is pretty good at it as well. So guys have done a good job. Our regular guys continue to do a good job on it, but then new guys have come in and really stepped up and replaced those missing guys in a good way.”


Over the last 24 games, the Bruins’ penalty kill is operating at a phenomenal 89.4-percent clip. To put that in perspective, the Devils finished the regular season with the NHL‘s best penalty kill at 86.4 percent.

And there's some praise for Reilly Smith, some Howard-Chara-Smith stuff, a note about Matt Bartkowski and Bean's narrative recap.

Comcast Sportsnet Northeast's Joe Haggerty is going to piss you off in the video below, but he tends not to pretend that he's objective at least. He talked about Kevan Miller, the "KIL" line, including Iginla's "dagger" goal near he end of the 2nd period...

With less than two minutes left in the middle stanza, Torey Krug fed a long pass up to Lucic, who moved into the offensive zone and dropped back a pass to a rushing Iginla. Rather than muddle through the motions Lucic moved hard to the net, and was ready to fire when Iginla finished off the give-and-go with a perfectly placed pass.

Jimmy Howard got a piece of Lucic’s shot just as he did in the third period of Game 1, but this time the bounce went against him as the puck trickled into the back of the net for Boston. The score gave the Bruins their insurance goal in a gut-punching manner, and signaled to Detroit that Boston’s most dangerous forward line was gathering steam.

“The good thing is, we were able to respond before the period was done. Especially when it felt like we were penalty-killing all period. It was a great play by Kruger [Torey Krug] to me to show some patience, and another great pass by Iggy [Jarome Iginla] to me,” said Lucic. “I had a lot of net to shoot at and thankfully it went in this time and didn’t take a hard left out. It was a good effort by all.”

Jimmy Toscano praised Reilly Smith and talked about Florek, and amongst Haggerty's "thoughts"...

The referees are paying much closer attention to the holding, interference and obstruction today, and that’s not a good sign for the Detroit Red Wings’ tactics against the Bruins. That will open the door for the Bruins to attack with much more speed than Game 1, something we’ve already seen today.

Cough bullshit cough--though the margin for error in "skating versus getting skated" is obviously razor-thin against Boston..

And amongst his "Talking Points":

“I think it’s important for us to really grasp what we did tonight, and really bottle that up, and know that’s what it’s going to take to beat this team. It’s going to be important for us to have that kind of intensity and that kind of determination to beat this team because it’s not an 8th-seeded team. It’s a really good hockey club.” –Claude Julien after Boston’s solid 4-1 win in Game 2.

It's going to take convincing the Wings to beat themselves and then executing better than Detroit does?

Boy, do I hope that it's more of the former than the latter, but what do I know, I'm biased.

Bruins Daily's Tim Rosenthal took note of other comments regarding the Bruins' would-be transformation:

“We knew the first game we didn’t play our best,” said B’s captain Zdeno Chara. “We wanted to make sure that we were better today, and I think we were. So we’ve just got to, again, continue to do the things that we do well and keep adjusting.”

The stat sheets show that the Bruins outhit the Red Wings 33-29. But as sexy as some stats are, there are other times where they don’t do justice, and that was certainly the case on Easter Sunday.

From the get-go, the Bruins were big and bad. From the bigger guys like Chara, Johnny Boychuk, Milan Lucic and Kevan Miller to the not so bigger guys like David Krejci, Reilly Smith and Torey Krug, the B’s threw their bodies at the Red Wings.

More importantly, those Big Bad Bruins threw the Red Wings off their game. Their frustration showed at key moments, too. Just ask Brendan Smith, who tried to engage in some post whistle activity with the bigger Chara, but was on the laughing end of Big Z’s smile and the other 17,565 chuckles inside TD Garden.

"I thought all the guys right from the start of the game were able to get some good, clean, hard hits consistently,” said Jarome Iginla, who tallied three hits and an assist in 17:12 of ice time. “It was a good emotional game, and it was nice to get that going in the right direction.”

The Toronto Sun's Rob Longley will actually continue that narrative...

“It should be every night,” Thornton said, emphasizing that the bruising Bruins approach had gone missing in the series opener. “We are aware this time of year that there’s no excuse not to have it. This time of year, we should always have that physical presence going.”


If Game 1 was a feeling-out process for both teams and an opportunity for the Wings to dictate the play and Game 2 was vintage Bruins, what lies ahead for Game 3?

“I think it’s important for us to really grasp what we did and really bottle that up and know what it’s going to take to beat this team,” Bruins coach Claude Julien said. “They’re certainly capable of doing damage if you’re not ready.”

As will NESN's Nicholas Goss:

The Bruins made a strong effort to crash the net and establish more traffic at the crease in Game 2. This adjustment made it difficult for Red Wings goaltender Jimmy Howard to see the puck, which resulted in him giving up many more rebounds than he did in the series opener.

Boston’s first power-play goal was made possible by Loui Eriksson screening Howard at the top of the crease. As the shot from the point came into the blue paint, Howard wasn’t able to track it and cover the puck. This allowed Bruins winger Reilly Smith, who went hard to the net for a potential rebound, to pounce on the loose puck for his first career playoff goal.

“It’s been a strength for us throughout the season, and we’ve just got to keep making plays and take our chances when we have them on the (power play),” Bruins forward Milan Lucic said. “It’s not always going to be pretty, it’s going to be those goals where you have to chip away and get those second or third shots. And you saw the two goals that were scored there on the (power play in Game 1) they were right in the crease.”

That was bad. That was very bad. Howard was shaky as shaky could be, but there was a Turnover Bakery open in the neutral zone and Highway to the Danger Zone was playing as the Wings backed in and let the Bruins crash their crease. They barely had to cycle the puck--they just moved it laterally in the corners a bit. The Wings' defensemen would wander off their angles, bang bang, out front and in the net.

NESN's Mike Cole also praised Florek and penned a recap, which includes this quip from Lucic, and we'll get to Goss's note from Alfredsson soon.

“I think getting that first one was huge, especially after not being able to get one past them last game,” winger Milan Lucic said. “Sometimes all it takes is a lucky bounce like that to kind of turn the tide and get some confidence and momentum in the goal-scoring department.”

SouthCoast Today's Mick Colageo praised Jarome Iginla's resilience, and this point is worth getting to early:

A longtime thorn in Boston's side as captain of the Ottawa Senators, Daniel Alfredsson finally left his first NHL club as a free agent to join the Red Wings so this enemy player knows the Bruins better than most. He admitted after Sunday's game that the Bruins got his team off its game. "A little bit. There were a few scrums, but I think overall we handled it pretty good. I don't think that's really an issue in this series," said Alfredsson.

After winning Game 1, Red Wings coach Mike Babcock was diplomatic about the style of game. But after losing Game 2 he challenged his team to dictate a game that would get the Bruins — but not his own players — into the penalty box.

"I just think you've got to decide what you want to do. Do you want to play like them or play like us?" he asked rhetorically. "I just looked at the sheet here. We had one, two, three, four roughing calls. We haven't had four roughing calls this year. So you've got to do what you do, not what they do."

The MetroWest Daily News's Dan Cagen noted that the other coach was completely satisfied with the way his team played...

"We're a team that doesn't mind the physical game, and it only works if you get there," coach Claude Julien said after the Bruins' 4-1 win at TD Garden. "Last game, we're weren't. Today, we were.

"We were able to use the physical aspect of our game a little bit more, and because of that, we were able to get pucks and turn pucks over a little bit more as well."

As was..Reilly...

 "I think power plays definitely helped us in the start and changed the tide," Smith said. "You know we're not getting too many pucks to the net at the start, and then you get the five-on-three and you're able to fire as many as you want. So that does definitely change the pace of the game and we benefitted off of it."


"When we play that style of hockey," Johnny Boychuk said, "everybody is going and everybody feeds off of each other."

Cagen also posited a discussion of the Bruins top line's play and a set of observations.

Moving on to Boston.com, Eric Wilbur noted Smith's comments, Anthony Travaglia praised Florek, and there's a bit about Chara-Brendan, Lucic's foot and this from Tuuka Rask, via Jeff Pini:

"[In] Game 1, I think both teams played pretty solid defense," Rask said. "Today again, we crashed the net a lot and got rewarded... Once we got that 4-1 lead, we kind of let up a little bit and gave them that speed and some chances. For the most part, I think our defense has been tremendous throughout these two games."

Rask continued while speaking to BostonBruins.com's Caryn Switaj (FFS screen Rask already!)...

Rask earned First Star honors, making 34 saves on 35 shots. David Krejci passed on the Old-Time Hockey Player of the Game Jacket to him in the Bruins' locker room for the effort.

His best save came with about nine minutes left in the third, when he got a piece of Brendan Smith's booming shot after Pavel Datsyuk had threaded him the puck wide open in the slot. The Bruins' netminder was as sharp as ever, and his teammates safely cleared any rebounds.

"It’s good to see that we’re pushing hard and we got rewarded pretty early, too," said Rask. "Especially at home, I think it’s important to get that physical start."

Who also noted this:

"[Our urgency] was much better, it was where we needed it to be to get a win," said Lucic. "And if we want to have some success moving forward that urgency has to remain high."

"When you play one game, I don’t think it speaks much about the series. We have to go in there and make sure we continue to do those things well," said Torey Krug. "I don’t think we can say we are comfortable. I think we understand what it takes to beat these guys and I think if we play like that, we will have success this series."

Bruins.com's Jess Inser posited a Wings take and praise for the "Young Guns" as well.

The Boston Herald's Ron Borges will start our slow and steady shift toward the Red Wings' perspectives...

"I just looked at the (stat) sheet here,” Red Wings coach Mike Babcock said. “We had one, two, three, four roughing calls. We haven’t had four roughing calls this year. I just think you’ve got to decide what you want to do. Do you want to play like them or play like us? You’ve got to do what you do, not what they do.”

The Herald's Mark Daniels noted that Florek is from Michigan (no offense, but in hockey, I don't give a shit, if you're not wearing a winged wheel on your chest, you're the enemy), and I like Steve Conroy, so I am going to take a deep breath before noting that he's bought into Julien's line of bullshit trucking. He penned a notebook, too.

The Bruins also benefited from some stricter enforcement of the rules. In Game 1, the B’s had to wait until the third period for their first and only power play, while the Wings were able to do a good job of interfering with puck-chasers, not blatantly enough to get called — especially not in the postseason — but just enough to prevent them from getting to their destination.

Yesterday, the Bruins forced Detroit to be a little more obvious about it, and the penalties were called. The B’s had three power plays in the first period to help stake them to a 2-0 lead.

What the Bruins' press corps has taught me, after 4 days?

It's good to have as many as 12 local news outlets trumpeting your coach's line of bullshit toward the NHL, because the NHL listens. They listen in Toronto, they listen in Montreal, and they listen in Boston.

Now does that mean that the Wings did not commit some lazy, STUPID penalties today? Oh of course they did. But still. Be *#$%@& consistent despite commentary, or the score. It's your one *#$%@& hard job, refs.

Amongst the Boston Globe's articles comes this from Amalie Benjamin's recap--appropriately, from Julien...

“It’s important for us to really grasp what we did [Sunday] and really bottle that up and know that’s what it’s going to take to beat this team,” Bruins coach Claude Julien said. “It’s going to be important for us to have that kind of intensity and that kind of determination to beat this team because it’s not an eighth-seeded team.”

She also talked about Florek's goal, and well...

The Bruins killed all four Red Wings power plays, after killing both in Game 1. “Penalty kill to me is extremely important,” Julien said. “Our penalty kill right now is doing a pretty good job, but when you have both units being able to do the job right, it helps a lot, and obviously it was a big difference in today’s game, the penalty kill being so good and getting [two] power-play goals.”

We will politely skip Dan Shaugnessy's "No way the Bruins were going to lose Game 2" and we will in fact transition to the Wings' perspectives full-time by the Boston Globe's Fluto Shinzawa's penned praise for Lucic...

“As poor as we were, I thought in the second period, we got the game to right where we wanted it,” said Detroit coach Mike Babcock. “It’s 2-1 and we’re going to be going into the third. It’s a simple two-on-two cross play and we don’t execute. Now we’re down, 3-1, and the game’s over.”


So Krug waited for a seam to develop to Lucic in the neutral zone. Once Lucic received Krug’s pass, he attacked Smith and Quincey. Once Lucic gave the puck to Iginla, he drove to the net. Smith got his stick tangled with Lucic and couldn’t recover. Neither could the Wings after Lucic’s goal beat Howard.

“I just didn’t get enough of it,” Howard said. “I got a lot of it, but I didn’t get enough of it and it went in.”

Babcock was displeased with his team's play, period, as he told the Boston Globe's Nancy Marrapese-Burrell...

“I thought we were ineffective period, to tell you the truth,’’ said the coach, whose team is 0 for 6 on the power play in the series. “I didn’t think we were very good. I thought they were better. I thought we were better than them in Game 1. I thought they were way better than us in Game 2. They were engaged, they won the battles. They were quick, we were slow. We didn’t execute.

And if you wish to read the Worchester Telegram & Gazette's Rich Garven's recap, the Eagle-Tribune's Bud Barth's "5 reasons to like the B's chances going forward" or NHL.com's Matt Kalman's recap for CBS Boston, which focuses on Zdeno Chara's increased ice time, enjoy, but it's time to let the out-of-towners make the permanent B's-to-Wings transition, with the Hockey News's Jason Kay wondering whether the Wings can stop the Bruins' train, and SI's Brian Cazenueve provides this from the Kaptain:

Detroit defenseman Niklas Kronwall knew the club would be in for a hard series after the first game. “Of course they were going to come out harder tonight,” he said. “They were better than us. Much better. We didn’t work hard enough to get zone time. We didn’t win battles on the boards. We didn’t do the little things. We get to go home now, but we can’t count on that.”

Daniel Alfredsson agreed while speaking to the Associated Press...

"It seems like we got hesitant and we weren't as assertive as we normally are," Detroit forward Daniel Alfredsson said. "That's been one of our strong suits ... setting up in the other team's end."

And he continued while speaking to NHL.com's Kalman:

"We didn't set up in their end," Detroit forward Daniel Alfredsson said about his team's power play. "Our breakouts, I think they read them too easily, and they did a good job in the neutral zone. Seems like we got hesitant and we weren't as assertive as we normally are, and I think that's been one of our strong suits is setting up in the other teams end. We are going to have to do a much better job of that because that's probably the difference today, the special teams."

Back to Kronwall, via DetroitRedWings.com's Bill Roose...

“I think they were even more aggressive than they were in Game 1. At the same time we weren’t as efficient as we were in Game 1,” Kronwall said. “They played their game better than we played our game and specialty teams that’s what made a difference, so they’re a really, really good team there’s no doubt about that.”

Still, the Red Wings feel somewhat satisfied to return home where they will play the next two games of the series – Tuesday and Thursday – in front of their fans after stealing home-ice advantage from the Presidents’ Trophy winners.

“You always want to win every game there’s no doubt about that,” Kronwall said. “But at the same time we got one here and now we’re heading back to Detroit, looking forward to playing in front of our home crowd.”

And now Alfredsson:

“They get off to the start that they want, get two quick goals there and they’ve always been one of the best teams at defending a lead,” Wings forward Daniel Alfredsson said. “I thought we did a good job of battling back in the second, but that third one for them hurt us a bit.”

Kronwall and Alfredsson had a bit of a special teams kibitz while speaking with the Detroit News's Ted Kulfan:

“It’s a combination. They’re doing a good job on the PK, no doubt, their forecheck,” defenseman Niklas Kronwall said. “At the same time we’re not doing a really good job, we’re not organized enough and executing on our break-ins.”

And that lack of effectiveness on the power play hurt Sunday, in the second period, with a golden chance to get back into the game.

“Our power play could have gotten us going,” Alfredsson said. “Last game, we were in it all the way. I don’t think we had to press as we did today to get back into the game and we can be a little bit quicker through the neutral zone. If we do that, we’ll get into their end a little bit better. (Sunday) we made it too easy for them at times.”


“We didn’t execute very well in our own zone and we spent too much time in our own zone,” Kronwall said. “You know last game we were able to come out a lot quicker than we did (in Game 2). Specialty teams like I had mentioned before was also a factor. We got to flush this one out and get back to playing again in Detroit.”

Kulfan penned a notebook about the Bruins' physical play, a dedicated Bruins notebook, a 3-star selection and a recap which pushes the narrative along...

“We played real solid in Game 1 and we had spurts (Sunday),” forward Daniel Alfredsson said. “But we can do better. We can be quicker (five-on-five), move the puck quicker. Not be too predictable. Coming back home and using the crowd with their energy and getting back to the way we play a little bit more.”

More than anything, get into the mental frame of mind that Babcock wants to see, and wasn’t there for large portions of Game 2.

“Let’s not take anything away from (Boston),” Babcock said. “They did a good job. We did a good job in Game 1. I didn’t think we did a good job in Game 2. So the lesson is, when you win Game 1, you’ve got to get ready for Game 2. You’ve got to get mentally engaged and ready to play. And we weren’t ready to play (Sunday) — I shouldn’t say that. We started fine, but we didn’t do what we needed to do.”

As well as something of a "Bottom Line" from Howard in his Wings notebook...

“We have to stay out of the BS out there and just play whistle to whistle,” goalie Jimmy Howard said. “Don’t worry about getting into any scrums or anything like that and proving your manhood out there. Just skate, play our hockey. Don’t get into their motive and get into their scrapping and playing real physical. Just get back to playing our game. We knew this was going to be a long series and they played a real solid game.”

Which brings a new voice into the conversation:

“It’s all about momentum in the playoffs,” forward Riley Sheahan said. “They played a great game and they were physical. There isn’t anything we can do now, so we’ve just got to take it back to Detroit, regroup, and go from there.”

MLive's Ansar Khan penned a quote-free recap, he noted some new voices' takes on...Everything...

Red Wings center Riley Sheahan: “Obviously they’ve got some heavy checkers, but we can’t let it get to us. We’ve just got to keep going and keep our feet moving, and use what we can do to our advantage.”

And Khan also noted that Babcock is well aware of his team's inability to win the first offensive zone draw on the power play...

“On special teams, they won the faceoffs, so they cleared it down,” Babcock said. “Their penalty kill forecheck was good, our power-play breakout failed to execute, so we got no zone time. It was like an exercise in skating up and down the rink.”

Just as Jimmy Howard was willing to address his dunderheaded channeling of Petr Mrazek head-on:

Justin Florek scored at 7:28, after Riley Sheahan passed the puck back into his own zone. Howard came out of his net to pass it to Brendan Smith, but it bounced off the defenseman’s leg. Florek corralled it and fired it into the net before Howard could get back into position.

“(The puck) flipped up a little bit and just sort of sailed,” Howard said. “It’s hockey, it’s a bad break and just unfortunate for us. Got them a little bit rolling in the first period.”

The Bruins went ahead 2-0 on the power play, when Smith knocked in a loose puck in the crease at 10:35.

“That was the moment when they started to get better,” Tomas Tatar said. “We get a penalty and they scored right away. They got on their horse and they were better in certain minutes than we were.”

Said Kronwall: “We’ll flush this one out, and get back to playing again in Detroit.”

The Free Press's Helene St. James put things bluntly regarding the game at even-strength...

The Wings won one game because they engaged the Bruins in a track meet, and the Wings are faster. They lost a game because they engaged in the Bruins’ goading, and the Bruins are bigger and nastier. When Smith went after Chara, Chara responded by encouraging him. Chara called it “playoff hockey.” He should have been specific: It’s Bruins’ playoff hockey.

Having Chara laugh in his face probably hurt Brendan Smith’s pride — he wouldn't talk to reporters after the game — but what hurt physically was first being hit by Johnny Boychuk and then by David Krejci. Smith had to sit on the bench for a bit after that before playing another shift. Justin Abdelkader was another guy who got hit hard as the Bruins took aim at a slower opponent than the one they got beat by in the opener.

The Wings learned something this weekend: If they play their style, they can win this series. They’ve got areas to improve upon — most pressingly, their power play — but they have four solid lines and a defense corps that at least in one game did a great job moving the puck. But the silly stuff has to stop, or Chara is going to be laughing a lot more.

And on the power play, too:

There’s little to do personnel-wise — captain Henrik Zetterberg is not available, and there’s no forward not on a unit who’d be an improvement over the personnel assigned. Each unit has what should lead to success — creativity, good shooters, net-front presence, someone who can shoot from the point.

I'd like to see two defesemen on the point, but that's just me.

Otherwise, Michigan Hockey's Stefan Kubus posited a game analysis...

The Oakland Press's Pat Caputo called the proper offensive players out after pointing out that Jimmy Howard laid several Easter Eggs...

Youngsters Nyquist and Tomas Tartar are capable of scorers — and they need to put the puck in the net.

But this is more than a “kids” thing. The Red Wings acquired Daniel Alfredsson for a playoff run. He was a non-factor in the first two games. With Ottawa, he scored 100 points and 51 goals in 121 playoff games, including 10 points in 10 games last season. Johan Franzen carries a reputation for “scoring goals in bunches.” Hey, the Red Wings could use a bunch about now.

David Legwand was acquired at the trade deadline with the hope he’d fill a void at center ice in the playoffs. He played 20 minutes per game in 22 playoff games the last two times Nashville got in, and scored nine goals. He wasn’t that type of threat in Game 1 and Game 2.

(Legwand's looked like he belongs on the 4th line. That's not good)

Surprisingly enough, the Detroit News's Gregg Krupa called out Howard for the weaknesses we're all familiar with...

He has given his club lots of chances to win over his five season, generally lifting his game in stretch drives to the playoffs and in the postseason. But Howard has weaknesses. Most prominently, handling the puck and rebound control.

Both bit him and the Red Wings Sunday, with nasty results. Howard’s mistake with the loose puck out of the Bruins zone on the first goal was a glaring example.

His failure to handle rebounds seemed to contribute significantly to both Smith’s goal and the third one by Milan Lucic, which restored the Bruins’ two-goal lead after Luke Glendening had brought it to 2-1.

Howard nearly had the puck wrapped up at Lucic’s feet. But it came out. That was a back-breaking goal at 18:16 of the second period, when the Wings had fought valiantly to restore their game.

So where do we go from here? Where's the denoument? The Free Press's Helene St. James reports that Niklas Kronwall's going to be a dad, that Johan Franzen's going to be a dad for the second time, and she also noted Babcock's telling comments from before the game:

FIRST IMPRESSIONS: Asked for his impressions of the first-round playoff series so far, Babcock replied, “Too many penalties. Same as every year first round. First round of the playoffs, you call too many penalties. It’s too tight. Then you loosen it off until there’s no penalties by the end. It’s the same every year. We say the standards the same? OK.” The Wings were assessed seven minors Sunday, same as the Bruins.

THE POWER OF PRESSURE: The fact the Wings are playing the NHL’s top regular-season team has brought up a lot of talk about how the pressure is on the Bruins. Babcock said there’s pressure on the Wings, too, because “pressure means you have a chance. We felt pressure coming in because we felt we had a chance. We’re going to feel that the whole time. Pressure is just something that should motivate you and help you be better. If you don’t have any pressure in your life, you’re probably sleepwalking through your job, think you’re doing a better job than you are, and getting fired soon.”

If you want to read MLive's Josh Slaghter's tidbits of NBC wisdom, DetroitRedWings.com's Bill Roose noted that Babcock and Julien offered some quid-pro-quo regarding the lineup machinations made during warm-ups (hint: DECEPTION!), the Free Press's Kirkland Craword looked at the Wings' records after splitting Games 1 and 2 in playoff series before heading home for Game 3 (and there's a picture of Lidstrom and Tomas Holmstrom with Homer's first set of teeth), the CBC's Tim Wharnsby penned an oddly-timed Smith-vs-Smith article (after Game 2?), and...We end up with the Free Press's Steve Schrader, who noted that the Bruins very happily admit they've been going after Brendan Smith..

“Reilly’s brother seems to be playing against our line a lot,” Marchand said before the game. “He’s on my side a lot too, so I’m up against him quite a bit. … I’ve got the inside scoop that he doesn’t like me very much.”

So we may as well end with a Mickeyism:

“Smith’s a tough kid,” Mickey Redmond said on Channel 4’s postgame show. “I can’t imagine him getting the better of a guy that’s got arms on him about 7 feet long.”

Better idea? Move the puck a little faster and be aware of the fact that the Bruins are targeting you. And avoid the skating redwood. Just say ni.


Highlights: Even the Wings' website has Emrick and the Flying Monkeys:

ESPN posted a 1:07 highlight clip;

The CBC posted a 1:18 highlight clip;

TSN, which aired the game in Canada, posted a 2:30 highlight clip;

And Sporstnet posted a 2:10 highlight clip.

Post-game: NHL.com posited a recappy thingy;

The Bruins filed a 2:42 post-game report;

Yes, Kerry Fraser did tell TSN that refs haven't "taken control" of several series;

Sportsnet's John Shannon raved about the Bruins' adjustments;

Pro Hockey Talk did the embedded highlight-slash-recap thing, and posted a clip too embarrasing for me to acknowledge (Oh, Brendan...)--ditto for the Hockey News's Jason Kay, click on Smith-vs-Chara stuff at your peril;

WEEI posted a post-game chat with Brad Marchand and Jack Edwards and Andy Brickely's takes on the game;

NESN posted comments from Milan Lucic, Jarome Iginla, Zdeno Chara and Justin Florek;

And CSNNE's videos include a bit from Babcock, comments from Tuuka Rask, Kevan Miller, Florek and Reilly Smith, and this from Joe Haggerty, who thinks that the Wings are going to continue to get hurt by their interfering ways, and that Jimmy Howard is shaky:

Photos: The Detroit Free Press posted a 35-image gallery;

The Detroit News posted a 33-image gallery;

The Windsor Star posted 17 BIG photos from the game;

ESPN posted an 85-image gallery;

And NHL.com, the Bruins' website and the Red Wings' website posted 67-image galleries.


Shots 35-29 Detroit overall. Detroit was out-shot 18-10 in the 1st period, but Detroit out-shot Boston 13-6 in the 2nd and 12-5 in the 3rd period.

Special teams: Boston went 2-for-4 in 4:31 of PP time, including 2-for-3 in 5-on-4 time; Detroit went a horrific 0-for-4 in 7:49 of PP time.

Goaltending: Tuuka Rask stopped 34 of 35 shots for Boston; Jimmy Howard stopped 25 of 29 for Detroit.

The 3 stars were picked by 98.5 the Sports Hub, and they picked Pavel Datsyuk, Johnny Boychuk and Tuuka Rask.

The Wings' goal: Glendening (1) from Helm (1) and Miller (1).

Faceoffs 35-27 Boston (Detroit won 44%);

Blocked shots 14-7 Boston;

Missed shots 9-7 Detroit (attempts 58-43 Detroit; Detroit had 35 shots ON the net and another 23 attempts wide/blocked);

Hits 33-29 Boston;

Giveaways 11-4 Boston;

Takeaways 8-2 Boston.

Individual stats:

Faceoffs: Datsyuk went 13-and-12 (52%); Sheahan went 6-and-8 (43%); Helm went 5-and-8 (38%); Glendening went 1-and-6 (14%); Legwand went 2-and-1 (67%).

Shots: Helm led the team with 5 shots; Nyquist, Sheahan and Jurco had 4 shots; DeKeyser and Franzen had 3 shots; Smith, Abdelkader and Tatar had 2 shots; Datsyuk, Legwand, Miller, Quincey, Glendening and Kronwall had 1 shot.

Blocked attempts: Helm fired 4 shots into Bruins players; Nyquist fired 3 shots into Bruins players; Alfredsson fired 2 shots into Bruins players; Smith, Sheahan, Jurco, DeKeyser and Franzen fired 1 shot into Bruins players.

Missed shots: Abdelkader, Legwand and Franzen missed the net 2 times; Smith, Nyquist and Sheahan missed the net 1 time.

Hits: Abdelkader, Tatar and Kronwall had 4 hits; Miller and Quincey had 3; Smith, Jurco and Helm had 2; Datsyuk, Legwnad, Glendening, DeKeyser and Franzen had 1.

Giveaways: Howard, Alfredsson, Sheahan and Helm had giveaways.

Takeaways: Alfredsson and Franzen had takeaways.

Blocked opponent shots: Quincey blocked 2 shots; Datsyuk, Lashoff, Glendening, Helm and Franzen blocked 1 shot.

Penalties taken: Tatar and DeKeyser took 2 minor penalties; Smith, Kindl and Quincey took 1 minor penalty.

Plus-minus: The Wings finished at -5. Smith, Miller, Tatar, Glendening and Kronwall finished at -1.

Points: Glendening had a goal; Miller and Helm had assists.

Ice time: Kronwall led the Wings with 25:03 played; DeKeyser played 21:06; Datsyuk played 21:05;

Quincey played 19:30; Franzen played 18:27; Smith played 17:04;

Alfredsson played 17:03; Nyquist played 16:11; Tatar played 15:48;

Kindl played 15:04; Jurco played 14:25; Helm played 14:16;

Sheahan played 14:07; Lashoff played 13:41; Abdelkader played 13:16;

Glendening played 13:06; Legwand played 12:58; Miller played 11:50.

Filed in: | The Malik Report | Permalink


George Malik's avatar

Update in the comments: From the Edmonton Journal’s JIm Matheson:

I’m going to miss TSN’s Ray Ferraro between the benches next NHL season now that Sportsnet’s got the broadcast rights. He’s the best in the business. I keep thinking he should be on an NHL management-team train, with his smarts. Ferraro tells a nice story about why Pavel Datsyuk is who he is. “(Son) Landon was at his first Detroit camp and he got on the same team as Pav,” said Ferraro, who played almost 1100 NHL games. “The way the Wings work it is they break into three groups and two play a game and the other works out in the gym and practices. Landon was taking off his equipment one day after not playing a game and he sees Pav doing the same, then putting on his gym stuff. Pav doesn’t look at Landon as he walks by, but Landon sees him and immediately puts on his gym stuff too. That’s the definition of a pro.”

Posted by George Malik from South Lyon, MI on 04/21/14 at 04:11 AM ET


Here’s the problem.  Had the Wings played a more passive physical game they would have been harshly criticized for not standing up to the physicality of the Bruins and would have lost by a similar amount, if in a different fashion.

That, in a nutshell, is the fine line of physical play.  You cannot simply cede the field there or else risk losing the ability to compete in the corners, nor can you hyper-engage and then risk overextending and leaving the strategy of the team.

Personally I think there’s a bit (okay, a metric ton) too much over-examination by George in search of The Reason (tm) why Detroit got their butts whipped yesterday.  They aren’t as good as the Bruins.  They got positively demolished in the first period and Boston was content to ride a two goal cushion for the rest of the game… and they still scored 2 more.  Howard wasn’t protected nearly as well as he was in game 1 and was roundly and decisively outplayed by Rask.

Detroit stole game 1, which hopefully gives them a chance to push this to 6 rather than 5 (although I still think this ends in 5), but Boston’s not some daisy-fresh team of youngsters with dew on their sticks, they’re playoff-hardened all the way up and down the roster in a way that Detroit is not.  Games like game 1 aren’t going to happen too many times in a playoff season for teams like Boston.

Posted by HockeyinHD on 04/21/14 at 06:24 AM ET

tekjansen's avatar

Did anybody else hear Howard in the background of the Kronwall post-game interview asking where his skate guards are? He asks twice, then you can hear him mentions University of Maine and something about 20 sticks. Then later when Jennifer Hammond is asking Kronwall a question, you hear him mention the skate guards again and say “they were right here!” and someone else asks if they are in his laundry bag.

Posted by tekjansen on 04/21/14 at 08:49 AM ET


“Nothing really, it’s just playoff hockey,” Chara said.

That is playoff hockey.  I know Wings fans haven’t seen that kind of rough stuff since getting destroyed by Nashville, but that really is playoff hockey and it really is the way the game has been called for the last few seasons.  No sense whining about it all the time.

The big, bad Bruins were just that.  Detroit’s only chance to win is by lulling them back to sleep, as they did in game 1.  But it looks like Detroit has no offensive answer anyway, and the umbrella on the PP (yes, you can blame some of it on Tom Renney) is atrocious.  It directly leads to the 1 shot and clear that you so often lament.  They are not trying to work the puck down low at all.  I’d like to see them use Pav behind the goal line once in a while, ala Gretzky and Crosby.  Pav opens up passing lanes as well as they did/do, and Franzen has the wicked wrister to execute no matter what gloves he’s wearing (lamest excuse ever?).

I would hope Andersson gets the call in game 3, but I suspect Babs will sit Jurco if he does, so I’m not sure that that is the best option.  Legwand should be excelling in this series, but appears to be playing himself out of town. Alfie is a step slow too, whether it’s his back or age—I’m not sure.

Posted by jkm2011 on 04/21/14 at 09:02 AM ET

bezukov's avatar

Honestly, if the Wings are gonna win this series, they aren’t going to do it in four games.  Boston is too good for that, you had to expect they were going be back with a better effort.

The one thing I would say to the Wings is, you have to weather the first ten minutes.  If Detroit had held firm in the first 10-12 minutes of the first period, you’re talking about a 2-1 game instead of 4-1.

Posted by bezukov from the kids are alright. on 04/21/14 at 09:29 AM ET


In all reality, no one in their sane mind could have possibly expected Wings to win both games in Boston. I hoped they could steal one game in Boston and they did. Ladies and Gents THAT IS HUGE.
Boston played a perfect playoff game yesterday and they outsmarted Wings young team. (I can’t believe I just said that). Babcock was correct when in-game interview he said Wings got sucked into playing Bruins’ game instead of their own game.
Wings don’t have a chance in this series without the kids’ line playing like they did in the regular season and so far they have been a non-factor.
Same for Alfredsson, he’s been awful, same for Legwand, like someone already said he is playing his way out of town, but knowing Holland’s track record, he’ll be resigned. By the way, has Legwand hit anyone in this series yet?
Tatar has been bad, Sheahan is not playing his game.
Franzen is invisible.
Let’s hope they get something going in Detroit.

Posted by George0211 on 04/21/14 at 09:42 AM ET

topshelf14's avatar

Heading back to Detroit 1-1 is all as a fan I can ask for. Whether we lost 1-0 or 8-0 yesterday doesn’t matter to me.  Just as long as we come back on Tuesday with a much better effort in front of there home crowd.

Again there is obvious reasons why we won the season series and why we won on Friday.  If we match the Bruins physicality with our explosiveness we may be able to win this series.  These players (Red Wings) have huge egos and that is a main reason why they’ve made it this far in the NHL, so being consistently pounded in the boards and taunted after every whistle wears on you as a man and makes you want to fight back.  Seeing Brendan Smith want to throw with Chara was example #1 (bad idea). Babcock must make sure the players are completely, and undoubtedly on the same page when it comes to how to beat this team. And only then, with egos put to the side, will they be able to make this a competitive series.

Posted by topshelf14 from Detroit, MI on 04/21/14 at 09:59 AM ET


There is no need to panic. Even yesterday, in the game everybody says we were totally outplayed, I thought we looked perfectly fine 5 on 5 and outshot Boston in the last 2 periods. First 12 minutes were fine as well until Howard made a horrible play. And we are obviously losing special teams battle this series, which is not surprising as our PP has been terrible since Lidstrom left, but the coaching staff is still using the same PP formula as if Kron is Lidstrom and Legwand is Holmstrom.
All we need to do is to finally put the players where they belong and have the best chance to succeed.
Franzen/Legwand/Nyquist was a good line, why separate them?
Shehan/Jurco/Tatar has been arguably our best line for the last 2 months of the season, why separate them?
Dats/Alfy/Abby - OK, Babs want Abby to play with Dats, fine, but give them Alfy who has chemistry with Dats when Franzen does not.
We can switch Legwand and Helm to give Helm more ice time if necessary.
More importantly, on a PP, stop with this stupid 4 forwards +1 defensman nonsense. Alfredsson’s, Tatar’s, Franzen’s, Nyquist’s shots has to be used from the hashmarks, not from a blue line. All these forwards should not be used at the point. We have Kronwall, Kindl, Dekeyser and Smith who are capable to manning the point better than any of our forwards and have a better shot from there.

Posted by VPalmer on 04/21/14 at 10:05 AM ET


How/why were uincey, Lashoff and Kindl all on the ice or Boson’s 2nd goal?!  Lashoff is so bad… he should be on a two-way and harldy eer see NHL ice.

Posted by Uncle Rico on 04/21/14 at 10:18 AM ET


How/why were uincey, Lashoff and Kindl all on the ice or Boson’s 2nd goal?

Q and Lashoff were on the ice for 5 on 3 and Kinld came off the penalty box.

Posted by VPalmer on 04/21/14 at 10:22 AM ET


We saw the Wings shoot themselves in the foot all last season, this season, and more specifically, in the playoffs against the Ducks and the the Hawks. For the most part, they came back to play a strong game after a mistake-prone loss in these series so there is nothing to suggest they can’t do that here.

They already showed us the winning formula Friday night…then promptly threw it away and decided to engage the Bruins thugs. Bad idea. I know, it makes you feel good, me included, but for every hit you take three and it wears on you. Time to play to their strengths…not Boston’s.

And, simply put, Howie HAS to be better. He gifted the Bruins with their first three goals yesterday and the best them in the world would find it hard to overcome that kind of performance. Personally, I want to see Mrazek here next year pushing Howie for that #1 spot….because right now Gus is only a stop gap.

Posted by NewfieWing on 04/21/14 at 10:52 AM ET

J.J. from Kansas's avatar

The autoplay on the CSNNE video is really fun.

Posted by J.J. from Kansas on 04/21/14 at 10:59 AM ET

Tracy from T-Town Hockey 's avatar

But what the *#$%@& are we supposed to give the Bruins credit for, other than encouraging the Wings to get in a knife fight with an alligator?

They did come up with a counter measure to our flying through the neutral zone last game.  Yes a lot of this game was on us and how we played, but their I formation at center ice did play a part, and we never really had an aswer for it.

Posted by Tracy from T-Town Hockey on 04/21/14 at 11:58 AM ET


I think Babcock will do a good job in game 3 with some adjustments and the last change.
Also, I know that we do not make excuses because of the injuries, but so far through 2 games, it’s an even series and we controlled the majority of 5 on 5 play in both games. Now add Z and Eriksson to our team and take out Babchuk and Krejci from Boston team…

Posted by VPalmer on 04/21/14 at 12:08 PM ET


George, I’ve heard Jurco and Lashoff are he only players skating today and the practice is optional. Could this possibly mean both will be scratched tomorrow.
Also, have anybody in the media ever tried to ask Babcock why Smith is not given PP time? I think he might be the best option we have as a PP quarterback (he has a good shot, can walk the blue line and could also help with zone entries).

Posted by VPalmer on 04/21/14 at 12:11 PM ET

George Malik's avatar

I just put up a practice post. The “optional skate” news is there…And Smith talked to the media.


Posted by George Malik from South Lyon, MI on 04/21/14 at 12:16 PM ET


I just put up a practice post. The “optional skate” news is there…

Thank you

Posted by VPalmer on 04/21/14 at 12:40 PM ET

bigfrog's avatar

ggravating fans’ nerves: Olczyk and McGuire gushing about the standard of officiating as the Wings let themselves get suckered)...

As I said previously why can’t they just go away? I e-mailed an executive at NBC last week about how horrible Eddie O. is, and requested he should be not broadcasting any games involving the Red Wings. I said the best remedy is to just fire him. I didn’t say anything about Cue Ball, but should have included him also. I’m sure he ignored my request.

Posted by bigfrog on 04/21/14 at 10:47 PM ET

Add a Comment

Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.

Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.

Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.


Notify me of follow-up comments?


Most Recent Blog Posts

About The Malik Report

The Malik Report is a destination for all things Red Wings-related. I offer biased, perhaps unprofessional-at-times and verbose coverage of my favorite team, their prospects and developmental affiliates. I've joined the Kukla's Korner family with five years of blogging under my belt, and I hope you'll find almost everything you need to follow your Red Wings at a place where all opinions are created equal and we're all friends, talking about hockey and the team we love to follow.


Recommended Sportsbook