by PuckStopsHere on 06/27/14 at 01:01 PM ET
When I look over the Hart Trophy voting (which can be seen here) I see some interesting things. Sidney Crosby ran away with the award. I do not know how he didn't win the award unanimously but nine of the 137 voters picked someone else. Ryan Getzlaf, Claude Giroux, Semyon Varlamov and Carey Price all received at least one first place vote.
The bggest confusion surrounding the Hart Trophy comes from a misapplication of its definition. The Hart Trophy is given to the player most valuable to his team. Some people interpret that as meaning the best player on a team that would otherwise be awful without him. A hypothetical team made of one average NHL player and bunch of old ladies who cannot skate would have a clear Hart Trophy winner in that model. The average NHL player would be the most valuable player to his team in that definition.
The best way to show the absurdity of this thinking is by analogy. Imagine you have two boxes containing diamonds. One box contains a $10 million diamond and several others worth $3 to $5 million. The other box contains a $1 million diamond and some shards of glass and gravel. Which diamond is the most valuable to its box? It's clearly the $10 million diamond. Its value is $10 million and that is more than any other diamond. Do you really think the $1 million diamond is worth more?
When we look at the Hart Trophy voting we see Sindey Crosby far ahead of anyone. The point I would most argue with is there is no defenceman who finished above Duncan Keith and Keith finished 15th in the voting mentioned on only nine ballots.
There is a clear undervaluing of defencemen is obvious if none are in the top 14 vote-getters. Since Duncan Keith won the Norris Trophy, he is clearly the most valuable defenceman. If I had a ballot, I would have placed him second and that is higher than any actual voter. Keith dominated his position. Yet he was overlooked.
There are two significant reasons for his being overlooked. One is the misapplication of the Hart Trophy definition. The Chicago Blackhawks have several good players including Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane. Thus Keith comes from a "box" with lots of valuable diamonds and some see that as less valuable than the one semi-valuable diamond in a box of otherwise worthless shards. The other reason is a historic undervaluing of defencemen in Hart Trophy results. Only three defencemen have ever won the award (Eddie Shore, Bobby Orr and Chris Pronger). Defencemen do not post the same offensive numbers as forwards do and tend to get lost in many voters' minds. Defencemen lack any really big numbers in their stat lines and that hurts their chances.
Is it possible that the 14 most valuable players in the 2013/14 season were not defencemen? That is what the Hart Trophy voting says. Duncan Keith is the best example of an overlooked defenceman in the Hart Trophy voting. He should have had a much bigger share of the votes. In fact only 12 voters put a defenceman in their top five votes for the Hart Trophy. Keith received nine of them, Shea Weber received two and Ryan Suter got one vote. Is that fair or logical? Players like Jamie Benn or Ben Bishop got more Hart Trophy votes than all NHL defencemen combined.
Add a Comment
Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.
Most Recent Blog Posts
About The Puck Stops Here
Who am I? A diehard hockey fan.
Why am I blogging? I want to.
Why are you reading it? ???