During the NHL season, trades are few and far between until the trade deadline. The deadline this year is March 3rd. Although that is still over a month away, there is a trade freeze during the Olympic break from February 12th to 28th. That leaves only three days for trades after the Olympics. Thus it was expected that trade deadline deals will begin before the Olympic break. They have and the Toronto Maple leafs are at the centre of it all.
Toronto has acquired Jean-Sebastien Giguere from the Anaheim Ducks in exchange for Vesa Toskala and Jason Blake. Giguere has not had a successful last year and a half but the talent is there. As recently as 2008 he was clearly one of the top goalies in the NHL. Last season, he suffered through the death of his father and it affected him on the ice. He lost the Anaheim number one goalie job to Jonas Hiller and has not been given a chance to play regularly since.
Nearly a week ago, Ken Campbell of the Hockey News wrote an article titled Kovalchuk Saga Shows Lockout Was A Farce. Hos premise is that the purpose of the lockout was to keep players with their current team, when the opposite is clearly the case.
The two major changes that were made during the lockout were a salary cap and a reduction in free agency ages. Both of which are moves that are going to increase player turnover. A salary cap will force teams to part with players that they otherwise would not want to part with in order to stay below the cap. Lower free agency ages will allow players the chance to leave a team on their own volition at an earlier age as well. The idea that a CBA designed to increase player movement can be judged as a failure because it lead to Kovalchuk’s likely departure from Atlanta is totally misguided.
When Georges Laraque signed a three year contract worth $1.5 million per year with a non movement clause in the summer of 2008 to join the Montreal Canadiens, it raised a few eyebrows. Laraque is a goon who was set to enter the decline phase of his career. Though he once scored 29 points in the 2000/01 season, his recent totals had been more modest (for example 13 in the season before that new contract). It was a reasonable question to ask if he would hold any NHL value into the third year of the contract and it was reasonable to wonder why he was given a no movement clause.
Things worked out worse than predicted for Laraque in Montreal. He was limited to only 33 games in his first season in Montreal - in part due to a back injury. He managed two assists and no goals in that season. This season, in 28 games so far, Laraque had three points. Montreal decided to admit the contract was a mistake. Laraque was released from the Habs and given notice that the remainder of his contract would be bought out this summer. This caused some minor controversy because the announcement came just after the Haiti earthquake and Laraque’s parents are Haitians. Much of Laraque’s extended family remains in Haiti.
Alexandre Burrows of the Vancouver Canucks has been very newsworthy lately. The controversy created by his allegations that referee Stephane Auger told him in advance that he would be out to get Auger in a mid-January game against Nashville have been widely debated in hockey circles. It seems the NHL has managed to make this story disappear for the most part, despite any serious investigation into events and with only Burrows receiving punishment as the “whistleblower”.
That isn’t the only thing Alexandre Burrows has done lately. He has been playing very well. In fact, he is the top goal scorer in the NHL so far in 2010. Burrows has 13 goals in 12 games so far in January. That gives him a two goal lead over nearest competitor Alexander Semin of the Washington Capitals.
The NHL sold the current central bargaining agreement as one that would deliver parity to the NHL. This idea was a one of the more popular explanations for why the lockout had been necessary. By removing the New York Rangers advantage to have the highest payroll in the NHL (and miss the playoffs eight years running); the new NHL would be one where anyone could win (for example 2004 Stanley Cup champion Tampa Bay). That was the theory the NHL advanced and it is one that is commonly repeated in the media, but with little effort spent in trying to verify if this parity exists.
Mudcrutch hockey wrote two very good posts on this topic here and here. These posts were made in responce to a radio interview with Gary Bettman that aired on Edmonton radio station 630 CHED. Interviewer Dan Tencer asked softball questions that assumed that parity had been delivered and that it was a good thing.
One of the hottest rumors for over a year is that the Tampa Bay Lightning are about to trade Vincent LeCavalier. No trade has happened yet, but as we approach the 2010 trade deadline speculation about a LeCavalier trade is rising. Coupled with any potential trade is the uncertain financial situation of the Tampa Bay Lightning. The NHL has likely taken over the team on some level. They have fronted money to the team to help them make payroll. The Lightning are in default on the initial loan used to purchase the team. Current owner Oren Koules was required to have a privately financed loan through previous owner William Davidson to buy the team, since he couldn’t secure funds from more traditional means. Koules has been unable to keep up with the payments.
In the meantime, Davidson died. This leaves his widow Karen Davidson as the major creditor to the Lightning. She also inherited the Detroit Pistons of the NBA and has made it clear that she wants to sell the team. She has no desire to be stuck with the Tampa Bay Lightning as well, but may wind up with them or may choose to stay removed from the team and leave them with an uncertain future.
When the San Jose Sharks were eliminated in the first round of the playoffs last season, a lot of pressure was placed on Patrick Marleau. He was the captain of the team but only managed three playoff points. There was speculation that he may be traded over the summer. The speculation peaked with rumors of a three team trade that would bring Dany Heatley to San Jose with Marleau heading in the other direction. San Jose eventually acquired Heatley without moving Marleau. The idea of trading Marleau would have been difficult due to the fact he has a no-trade clause in his contract.
Patrick Marleau was stripped of his captaincy in San Jose. He returned to the team for the final year of his contract with a lot of pressure on his shoulders. He has responded well to that pressure.
The Edmonton Oilers have lost their last ten games in a row and 17 of their last 18 games. Going back to mid-December, their only win comes December 30th against the Toronto Maple Leafs. The Oilers have a a 16-34 record (with six regulation tie points). This puts them last in the West Conference and one point ahead of the Carolina Hurricanes for last place in the NHL. They are 11 points behind Columbus, who are second last in the West Conference.
Injuries have significantly hurt the Oilers this season. They lead the NHL in man-games lost to injury. Two significant injuries in November that the Oilers did not have the depth to overcome have derailed the season. Top scorer Ales Hemsky and number one goaltender Nikolai Khabibulin have been out since November.
Corey Locke of the Hartford Wolf Pack (New York Ranger affiliate took over the AHL scoring lead in November. He has recently been caught by two members of the Hershey Bears (Washington Capitals affiliate) who were behind him because of time that they had spent in the NHL. Keith Aucoin is the current AHL top scorer with 57 points in 37 AHL games played. Aucoin has been called up with Washington for nine games - in which he scored five points in limited ice time. The second highest scorer is Alexandre Giroux. He has 53 points in 34 AHL games played. He also has nine NHL games this year with three points in limited ice time. They leave Corey Locke in third in the scoring race with 48 points in 44 AHL games played.
Over a week ago, the Stephane Auger/ Alexandre Burrows incident came to light. It is alleged that referee Stephane Auger warned Burrows before a game that a Burrows dive in a previous game had made him look bad and then proceeded to make a couple marginal to poor calls against Burrows in the game of that day to “even things up“. The NHL responded by fining Burrows for speaking to the media about the incident and then closed the books. More official NHL media have moved on and are trying to help the incident be forgotten. It is up to independent members of the blogosphere to keep the story alive.
Tom Benjamin wrote a good piece on how this issue should be framed. The issue is not about putting Burrows character on trial. The issue is not about how to punish diving. Those may be separate issues worth thinking about, but the issue that is brought to light is that referees (at least one) make a conscious decision to not be impartial in games. They plan to “go after” a certain player or players because of a personal vendetta and do not care if that changes the outcome of the game. This calls into jeopardy the idea that the game is officiated impartially.
About The Puck Stops Here
Who am I? A diehard hockey fan.
Why am I blogging? I want to.
Why are you reading it? ???