Last season, Jeff Schultz of the Washington Capitals led the NHL with a +50 +/- rating. This is the highest +/- rating achieved in an NHL season since 2002/03 when Peter Forsberg and Milan Hejduk both went +52. Naysayers have looked at this number and concluded that there is something wrong with +/-. In this case, the problem is that +/- does not give them the information that they want it to give them. It does not give them a realistic ranking of the best players in the NHL. However, this number gives us a lot of information and shows us that Jeff Schultz did have a very strong year in 2009/10. He excelled in his role with the Capitals.
The first problem one would bring up about Schultz’s raw +/- number is that he played with the President’s Trophy winning Capitals. They were the team with the highest team +/- and therefore their players should have the highest +/- ratings as well. It is argued that Schultz’s +/- is a team effect. This is partially true. Hence we try to remove team effects by using adjusted +/-.
The last hockey game of any consequence was played last night. The Hershey Bears (Washington Capitals affiliate) defeated the Texas Stars (Dallas affiliate) by a score of 4-0 to clinch the Calder Cup in a four games to two victory.
There are several sabermetric analyses of hockey that I like, but rarely see published in any form online or elsewhere. I plan to calculate some of them and the associated analysis that comes with them for the first part of the summer and then move onto new sabermetric problems.
Today, I want to look at adjusted +/- ratings. This first appeared in the Klein and Reif Hockey Compendium. The basic idea is to subtract off team effects from individual players to compare +/- ratings between teams. It doesn’t give you a list of the best players in the NHL (no sabermetric method does this), but it gives you a list of players who excelled in the role they played in a given season.
It was May of 2009, when the Phoenix Coyotes declared bankruptcy. Last summer was spent in bankruptcy court where Jim Balsillie attempted to purchase the team and move it to Hamilton and when other potential suitors dropped out, the NHL attempted to purchase the team as well. Neither were awarded the team in the courts, but the NHL soon bought the team directly from Moyes. The plan was for the NHL to sell as soon as a suitable buyer was found. After a year of trying, it looks like none will be found willing to keep the team in Glendale, Arizona.
In December, a potential sale to Ice Edge Holdings was announced. This sale has not come together. Ice Edge Holdings is a group fronted by Anthony LeBlanc and Daryl Jones, who would keep the team in Phoenix, while playing a few games a year in Saskatoon. The problem is nobody in this group has enough money to buy the team and they have failed convincing banks to give them the credit to do so. The mere idea that the NHL is considering such an ownership group shows their level of desperation.
I think one important part of the NHL story that is under reported is that of the NHLPA. Therefore I have kept a short history of the NHLPA that I am updating annually.
Here is the most recent version. A far more detailed history that ends in the early 1990’s is the book Net Worth by David Cruise.
Now that the off season has arrived, there will likely be a few retirements of future Hall of Fame players. The first one has not been officially announced yet, although the story broke during the Stanley Cup finals. Rob Blake is retiring.
Rob Blake was born December 10th. 1969 in Simcoe, Ontario. He grew up playing hockey in the Ontario hockey system and made it to the junior B level before jumping to the US college system to play for Bowling Green University in Ohio. In those days there were significantly more junior hockey opportunities for Canadians in the US system than there are today. After his first year in Bowling Green, the Los Angeles Kings selected him in the fourth round of the draft 70th overall. Blake was a big talented defenceman, but he had yet to show dominance at any level.
With their 4-3 overtime victory over the Philadelphia Flyers, the Chicago Blackhawks won the Stanley Cup finals series four games to two and won the Stanley Cup. This is the first Stanley Cup victory for the Blackhawks since 1961. That was the longest Stanley Cup drought were the team had existed during the entire period. The new longest drought is that of the Toronto Maple Leafs, who last won the cup in 1967 and the St Louis Blues and Los Angeles Kings, who expanded in 1967 and have never won the cup.
Jonathan Toews was given the Conn Smythe Trophy as playoff MVP, but I would support giving it to Daniel Briere of the Flyers, who was the playoffs top scorer and had a much better final series than Toews, but never had a serious chance as his team was not the cup winner.
The Stanley Cup may be won tonight. Along with it comes the Conn Smythe Trophy for playoff MVP. The race for Conn Smythe is pretty open. As the main story in the Stanley Cup finals has been the poor quality of play, it is easier to make a list of who will not win the Conn Smythe than who will win it. Goaltenders will not win the Conn Smythe because they have not played well in this series. With 40 goals in the five games so far, the goaltending has been sub-par. Antti Niemi and Michael Leighton cannot be seriously considered for the Conn Smythe. In fact, if there was a trophy for best goaltender in the playoffs, I would support giving it to Jaroslav Halak of Montreal, despite his failure to make the finals.
It has been a busy couple of days of coaching news in the NHL. Both the Columbus Blue Jackets and the Tampa Bay Lightning have dipped into the AHL to hire new coaches. Columbus began by offering their coaching position to Guy Boucher, the coach of the Hamilton Bulldogs in the AHL. Surprisingly, he declined. They quickly offered the job to Scott Arniel, the coach of the Manitoba Moose in the AHL and he took the job. Boucher’s declining the Columbus position was explained when the next day he accepted the coaching job with the Tampa Bay Lightning.
The NHL’s turn to AHL coaches for many of their coaching vacancies over the last couple of years seems to have began when Washington hired Bruce Boudreau as coach . Boudreau won coach of the year, largely because his team had a very good young core built around Alexander Ovechkin, Nicklas Backstrom and Mike Green that was ready to take off and they did. That was followed up by a talented Pittsburgh team in a cold spell that hired AHL coach Dan Bylsma and then won the Stanley Cup. Suddenly, AHL coaches were the coaches to hire.
The series looked like it might be okay. Game one was poor quality hockey, but games two through four were passable Stanley Cup finals games. They were not the most memorable well-played games, but they were not too bad. Then along comes game five. I strongly disagree with Pierre Lebrun , Chicago brought their B game at best and it was enough to win big. By the end of the first period, Chicago had a 3-0 lead and Michael Leighton was pulled from the game (the second time that he was pulled in the finals so far). That was all it took. From then on it was not an intense game for either team. Defensive gaffes were commonplace. Both teams scored four more goals each and the game ended 7-4.
What does Philadelphia do for goaltending in game six? Leighton has not carried the load in the finals. Brian Boucher hasn’t been any better when he came in in relief. Their lack of quality goaltenders seems to have stopped all momentum. It is surprising it took until the Stanley Cup finals to occur, but otherwise very predictable.
About The Puck Stops Here
Who am I? A diehard hockey fan.
Why am I blogging? I want to.
Why are you reading it? ???