by PuckStopsHere on 07/06/11 at 03:31 PM ET
Nieuwendyk is a recent enough addition to my Hall of Fame lists that I have a blogpost from when I first considered him a Hall of famer and a career retrospective from when he retired.
In order to make Hall of Fame cases I am using the Keltner List, which was made popular by Bill James in baseball. It is a list of qualitative questions that get to the heart of any player`s Hall of Fame candidacy.
Here is the Keltner List for Joe Nieuwendyk:
1. Was he ever regarded as the best player in baseball? Did anybody, while he was active, ever suggest that he was the best player in baseball?
I don`t think anyone seriously considered Joe Nieuwendyk the best player in hockey. Of course his career corresponded with such greats as Wayne Gretzky, Mario Lemieux, Steve Yzerman, Mark Messier and others so he faced tough competition.
2. Was he the best player on his team?
I think some people considered Nieuwendyk the best member of the Calgary Flames at one time. He had tough competition from players like Al MacInnis, Joe Mullen, Gary Suter and Theo Fleury, so it was never particularly clear. When he moved onto Dallas, I don`t think people ranked him ahead of Mike Modano or Brett Hull and in New Jersey Martin Brodeur and Scott Stevens were ranked ahead of him. Nieuwendyk probably was the best player on his team at one point in the 1990`s with Calgary, but not for any long period of time.
3. Was he the best player in baseball at his position? Was he the best player in the league at his position?
Nieuwendyk was definitely not the best centreman at any point. People like Wayne Gretzky, Mario Lemieux, Steve Yzerman and Joe Sakic were always ranked well ahead of him.
4. Did he have an impact on a number of pennant races?
Yes definitely. Nieuwendyk won three Stanley Cups with three different teams. He was name playoff MVP in 1999 when he won the cup with Dallas. He also won the cup in Calgary in 1989 and in New Jersey in 2003. He also went to the finals and lost in 2000. Nieuwendyk is 18th all time in playoff goals with 66. Most players ahead of him have more playoff games played.
5. Was he a good enough player that he could continue to play regularly after passing his prime?
Yes. Nieuwendyk remained active in the NHL until age 40 when a back injury led to his retirement. In his last full NHL season 2005/06, he was one of the top offensive players on the Florida Panthers scoring 56 points in 65 games.
6. Is he the very best player in baseball history who is not in the Hall of Fame?
I would argue no. I would argue that Adam Oates and Sergei Makarov rank ahead of him, but this is debatable. I could imagine somebody answering yes to this question and having a strong logical argument.
7. Are most players who have comparable career statistics in the Hall of Fame?
Yes. Nieuwendyk is the 21st highest goal scorer all time with 573 career goals. Nobody Hall of Fame eligible has more career goals and is not in the Hall except for Dave Andreychuk. Nieuwendyk ranks further back in points as he was never as good an assist man as a goal scorer. He ranks 51st all time with 1126 career points. This is a total where most players make the Hall of Fame, though a few exceptions do exist.
8. Do the player’s numbers meet Hall of Fame standards?
Yes they do. He does quite well in the all time scoring lists.
9. Is there any evidence to suggest that the player was significantly better or worse than is suggested by his statistics?
Nieuwendyk`s biggest scoring years came in the highest scoring era in NHL history, though the “dead puck era” soon followed. Hence i don`t know that his career totals are significantly affected by the era in which he played. Defensively, he always had value due to his faceoff skills, but he was never one of the best defensive forwards in the game. I would say that Nieuwendyk is approximately as good a player as his statistics suggest.
10. Is he the best player at his position who is eligible for the Hall of Fame but not in?
I would argue Adam Oates is the best eligible centreman. I might argue for Eric Lindros as being a better centre as well, as Lindros had a much higher peak, though less longevity. Some might argue the answer is yes Nieuwendyk is the best centre not in the Hall of fame and make a solid argument, though I wouldn`t.
11. How many MVP-type seasons did he have? Did he ever win an MVP award? If not, how many times was he close?
I wouldn`t suggest that Nieuwendyk ever had an MVP type season. He never made a First or Second All Star Team, so he was never considered first or second best in his position in any NHL season.
12. How many All-Star-type seasons did he have? How many All-Star games did he play in? Did most of the other players who played in this many go into the Hall of Fame?
He played in four NHL All Star Games. This number is low for a Hall of Famer, but certainly not unprecedented. There are four or five more years he could have been in the All Star Game as some all stars who did play in the game were having worse seasons than he was. His best bet would have been the 1994/95 season, which was lockout shortened and no All Star Game existed. Nieuwendyk had 50 points in 46 games that year.
13. If this man were the best player on his team, would it be likely that the team could win the pennant?
In the 1999 playoff run, Nieuwendyk was named the best player on his team. I think Mike Modano and Brett Hull were better players, but perhaps not during that short run. This shows that a team where Nieuwendyk was the best player could have done quite well, but I think it would require there were other players who were not significantly worse than Nieuwendyk. I do not think he was the best player in the 1989 cup run with Calgary (Al MacInnis was) and there is not much argument that he was in 2003 (Brodeur, Stevens). The answer here is yes, but it is a qualified yes, Nieuwendyk could be the best player on his team that won the Cup, but not without a very significant supporting cast.
14. What impact did the player have on baseball history? Did he introduce any new equipment? Did he change the game in any way?
It is hard to find a lasting impact for Nieuwendyk. He was a good player for a long time in several markets. He was never the clear standout player in any market. He was a solid player on two Canadian Olympic teams, but hardly the star. I think the answer to this question is no.
15. Did the player uphold the standards of sportsmanship and character that the Hall of Fame, in its written guidelines, instructs us to consider?
Yes. Nieuwendyk was a very good character player with all of his teams and has no off-ice issues. This is why he was quickly rushed into a general management position with the Dallas Stars after he retired.
Nieuwendyk put up very good career numbers. He had a long career where he was a very good player. He was never the best player in the game and he was never an MVP candidate. He belongs in the Hall of Fame, but given the backlog of players available this year it isn`t clear he was the best possible choice this year. I think it is a testament to how well respected he is that he was inducted before Adam Oates or Dave Andreychuk or Sergei Makarov or Eric Lindros, but he does deserve his induction.
Add a Comment
Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.
Most Recent Blog Posts
About The Puck Stops Here
Who am I? A diehard hockey fan.
Why am I blogging? I want to.
Why are you reading it? ???