Last year, I wrote that the Selke Trophy voting was all messed up. I did this because there is no consensus on who to pick. Last year, there were 70 names picked on the writers’ ballots. The winner in Pavel Datsyuk was omitted from 10% of the ballots entirely. People had significant showings for having high +/- ratings without being particularly strong defensively or because they had established reputations as defensive forwards, but did not have particularly good seasons. For example, Rod Brind’Amour had the worst adjusted +/- rating in the league and several votes including one first place vote.
A year later little has changed.
The Hart Trophy was awarded to Henrik Sedin last week. I had been picking Alexander Ovechkin and feel that an incorrect choice was made. Sidney Crosby was the third nominee and he was also a strong candidate in the race.
The three MVP nominees all finished with 109 to 112 points (Sedin had 112 and the other two 109). Looking at raw offensive totals there is little difference between them. The difference between them likely has to be found either by showing their offensive numbers are not as close as they seem or by looking at things not reflected in those numbers (primarily defence).
This past week the 2010 Hockey Hall of Fame inductions were announced. The only male player inducted was Dino Ciccarelli. I think he is a player who belongs in the Hall, although there are other players who also belong there who were passed over this year. In the comments of the Hall of Fame induction thread, I promised Matthew McCallum that I would lay out his Hall of Fame case with the Keltner List of Hall of Fame questions popularized by Bill James.
Here it is:
The NHL draft is underway. The first round went yesterday and the remainder is going to occur today. It is always hard to make authoritative comments on the draft. Many players are players I have never seen. Of the few players I have seen, I have rarely seen them play very much. Even if I had seen them play a lot, I would probably get it wrong quite often as history shows the scouts do when you look at past drafts.
This draft had the false hype of Edmonton’s choice between Taylor Hall and Tyler Seguin at first overall. I think that Edmonton had decided upon Hall well before the draft, but the decision was not announced publicly, so there was a story created around it. It would have been a bit of a shocker if they did pick Seguin.
A few days ago future Hall of Famer Scott Niedermayer announced his retirement and I am only now getting around to writing his career retrospective.
Scott Niedermayer was born on August 31st, 1973 in Edmonton, Alberta. As a very young kid, his family moved to the Kootenay region of eastern British Columbia and he grew up playing hockey in the minor hockey system there. In 1989 he started his junior career when he joined the Kamloops Blazers of the Western Hockey League. There he quickly blossomed into a star. By 1991, he was named to the WHL West First All Star Team and named Canadian Major Junior scholastic player of the year for a season where he scored 82 points in 57 games from defence. He also played on the gold medal winning Canadian team at the World Junior Championships. This was good enough to make him the third overall pick in the 1991 draft by the New Jersey Devils. This was the infamous draft pick that Toronto traded for Tom Kurvers, thus eliminating them from the Eric Lindros sweepstakes (Lindros was the consensus first overall pick that season).
Yesterday was the NHL Awards presentations, so I want to take some time and comment on who won. Here is how I would have voted if i had an award ballot. My voting does not mesh exactly with the NHL voting since I listed only three nominees for the awards and in most cases the NHL awards have five votes. Here are my comments made when the award nominees were announced.
As for actual results, here are the voting results for most awards. Missing from the list is the Masterton. In the past, I have never been able to find Masterton voting (I do not think the NHL releases it), but nevertheless if you know a source for it please let me know in the comments. Here are voting results for the first and second all star teams.
The 2010 Hall of Fame inductions were announced yesterday. In are Dino Ciccarelli, Angela James, Cammi Granato, Jimmy Devellano and Daryl (Doc) Seaman. The story most are talking about is who isn’t getting inducted this year. Available players this year included Joe Nieuwendyk, Eric Lindros, Doug Gilmour, Adam Oates, Dave Andreychuk and Pavel Bure. Although it is expected that most of these players will be inducted someday, none are inducted this year. Also passed over was builder Pat Burns. Burns is a three-time coach of the year and likely dying of cancer. Sentimentally, people would like to see him get inducted while he is still alive. Although, other coaches with similar or better records such as Fred Shero have not been able to find spots in the Hall. I see burns as a person who is a serious candidate because of cancer and that isn’t a good reason for induction.
So far this summer I have tallied some important sabermetric statistics. I have listed the top 20 and worst 20 adjusted +/- ratings when adjusted as a rate stat and the top 20 adjusted as a counting stat . To complete this +/- analysis, I will list the worst 20 players with the rate stat adjustment.
Here is this list (as calculated by Gabe Desjardins of Behind the Net) :
I think that Christian Ehrhoff had the biggest improvement in his defensive game in the 2009/10 season when compared to the 2008/09 season. This is not to be confused with Drew Doughty who is a defenseman that was the most improved player in the league. A significant part of Doughty’s improvement was his jump from 29 to 57 points (an offensive improvement), while Ehrhoff was up from 42 to 44 points with a big jump defensively.
Ehrhoff’s defensive improvement can be seen by looking at adjusted +/- ratings. In 2008/09 he was eighth worst in the league. This season he was fourth best. That is a tremendous leap. It is uncommon for a player to improve on that level and the improvement is defensive.
I have already posted the players with the top 20 adjusted +/- ratings as a counting stat and as a rate stat. It is time to look at the flip side of these numbers and see who is failing in the role and putting up a bad adjusted +/-. Today, I will post the counting stat list.
Here it is:
About The Puck Stops Here
Who am I? A diehard hockey fan.
Why am I blogging? I want to.
Why are you reading it? ???