Kukla's Korner Hockey

Kukla's Korner Hockey

What Expanded Video Review Means

06/19/2019 at 6:37pm EDT

GMs meet in Vancouver tomorrow to discuss...

via Bob McKenzie tweets,

Details on expanded video review/coaches challenge/officiating modifications that have been approved by Competition Committee and today by NHL B of G are sketchy because GMs need to hear/sign off tomorrow in VAN, but here’s some of what we’re hearing:

Referees would be permitted to check their own work by viewing monitor at penalty box after they’ve assessed a major penalty or a double minor and, if necessary, amend/rescind or uphold the call.

Coaches challenge for video review would be expanded to include ability to challenge missed calls that lead to tainted goals — uncalled illegal hand pass (Meier to Karlsson); uncalled high-sticking of puck to a teammate; uncalled puck hitting the out-of-play protective netting.

Not 100 per cent certain of this but I believe a failed challenge in these instances would result in a minor penalty, same as the current rule for coaches’ challenge on offside. If so, that would limit volume of challenges and eliminate frivolous challenges.

Again, just a guess, but I would think these new video review challenge criteria would become an automatic review by Hockey Ops situation room if in final minute of a game or in overtime.

added 7:06pm, Nicholas J. Cotsonika with a review of today's BOG meeting,

"We have some very specific things that we'll be talking to the general managers about, seeking their input and hopefully ultimately their approval," NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman said after the Board of Governors met Wednesday.

Commissioner Bettman and NHL Deputy Commissioner Bill Daly declined to give specifics until after the GMs meet.

"There will be a lot of specificity tomorrow," Daly said. "We have specific rules. We just have to get the language."

The Competition Committee recommended changes to the coach's challenge and expanded video review, including as it relates to a referee's ability to review some of his own calls on the ice.

The Competition Committee also recommended:

-- A player be reasonably required to leave the ice if his helmet comes off during play.

-- The defending team not be allowed to change lines when a goalie freezes the puck on a shot from outside the red line. The attacking team would have the choice of end-zone dot for the face-off.

-- The attacking team have the choice of end zone dot on a face-off after an icing and starting a power play.

-- The defending team not be allowed to change lines and the attacking team have the choice of end-zone dot for the face-off, if an official determines a skater on the defending team knocks off the net unintentionally.

-- All face-offs be at one of the two dots in the attacking zone when the attacking team is responsible for the puck going out of play in the attacking zone.

more

Create an Account

In order to leave a comment, please create an account.

About Kukla's Korner Hockey

Paul Kukla founded Kukla’s Korner in 2005 and the site has since become the must-read site on the ‘net for all the latest happenings around the NHL.

From breaking news to in-depth stories around the league, KK Hockey is updated with fresh stories all day long and will bring you the latest news as quickly as possible.

Email Paul anytime at [email protected]