Kukla's Korner Hockey
Video- “That Is In The Net’ No Goal By Kyle Turris
by Paul on 11/20/13 at 01:33 PM ET
Comments (1)
from Kerry Fraser of TSN,
While it "appears" that Kyle Turris' shot "quite possibly" crossed the goal line based on the heel position of Nicklas Grossmann's skate, various angles of video do not provide the necessary conclusive evidence to overturn referee Paul Devorski's initial call on the play and allow a goal.
While it is more probable than not that the puck crossed the goal line, the fuzzy depth perception that we gain once the puck deflected off Grossmann's left skate and went airborne provides a lack of conclusive evidence that is required to allow a goal through video review. The men in the NHL's Situation Room cannot make their decision based on any "logical assumptions" but must clearly see the puck enter the net. Even with various camera angles that are available, that process is made much more difficult once the puck leaves the ice surface and takes flight.
continued and watch the play below...
Filed in: NHL Teams, Ottawa Senators, Philadelphia Flyers, | KK Hockey | Permalink
Tags: kyle+turris
Comments
Add a Comment
Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.
Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.
Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.
Most Recent Blog Posts
Video- Contributions To Women’s Hockey
Barry Beck Upset With A Few Organizations Regarding The Death Of Mark Pavelich
Video- Wayne Gretzky On His Father Today
More Patience Requested In Vancouver
About Kukla's Korner Hockey
Paul Kukla founded Kukla’s Korner in 2005 and the site has since become the must-read site on the ‘net for all the latest happenings around the NHL.
From breaking news to in-depth stories around the league, KK Hockey is updated with fresh stories all day long and will bring you the latest news as quickly as possible.
Email Paul anytime at pk@kuklaskorner.com
Has anyone in the NHL explained why they can’t put a sensor in a puck that would make sure things like this never happened? Not technically feasible? Too expensive? Not a sensible solution?
Posted by Chris M on 11/20/13 at 08:49 PM ET