Home bias much here from commentators? Sutter had enough space to turn, and Stamkos barely shoved him. He didn’t have to jump over Garon. Also, Garon’s making a save, so it’s still interference regardless of if it’s in the crease. Same call was made on Gionta when he steamrolled Reimer back in October.

Posted by steve from toronto on 03/04/12 at 02:34 AM ET

Steve must be a new guy, because that was purely Stamkos shoving Sutter into the goalie.  I have looked at this several times, but that was a good shove by Stamkos with his right hand that steered Sutter into the goalie.  Regulation that is a penalty, but in OT, probably not.  Or better yet, offsetting minors as Stamkos interferred with Sutter.

Posted by DocF on 03/04/12 at 02:48 AM ET

How Stamkos didn’t get a penalty on that play is beyond me. He was clearly holding Sutter. It even looked like he was apologetic after the fact.

Posted by Iggy_Rules on 03/04/12 at 04:15 AM ET

Umm, Stamkos didn’t push him.  In fact, he barely even touched him.  That shouldn’t have been a penalty.

Posted by scotts0 from New York on 03/04/12 at 02:35 PM ET