Kukla's Korner Hockey
Toronto (January 6, 2012) – National Hockey League Players’ Association (NHLPA) Executive Director Don Fehr issued the following statement this evening regarding the League’s realignment proposal:
“On the evening of December 5, 2011, the NHL informed the NHLPA that they proposed to put in place a four-conference format beginning with the 2012-13 season. As realignment affects Players’ terms and conditions of employment, the CBA requires the League to obtain the NHLPA’s consent before implementation. Over the last month, we have had several discussions with the League and extensive dialogue with Players, most recently on an Executive Board conference call on January 1. Two substantial Player concerns emerged: (1) whether the new structure would result in increased and more onerous travel; and (2) the disparity in chances of making the playoffs between the smaller and larger divisions.
added 8:09pm, Make sure to check out the numerous updated being made below…
NEW YORK (January 6, 2012) - The National Hockey League announced today that it will not move forward with implementation of the Realignment Plan and modified Playoff Format recently approved by the NHL Board of Governors for the 2012-13 NHL season because the NHLPA has refused to provide its consent.
“It is unfortunate that the NHLPA has unreasonably refused to approve a Plan that an overwhelming majority of our Clubs voted to support, and that has received such widespread support from our fans and other members of the hockey community, including Players,” said NHL Deputy Commissioner Bill Daly. “We have now spent the better part of four weeks attempting to satisfy the NHLPA’s purported concerns with the Plan with no success.
Because we have already been forced to delay, and as a result are already late in beginning the process of preparing next season’s schedule, we have no choice but to abandon our intention to implement the Realignment Plan and modified Playoff Format for next season.”
“We believe the Union acted unreasonably in violation of the League’s rights. We intend to evaluate all of our available legal options and to pursue adequate remedies, as appropriate.”
As a result of the League’s decision today, the NHL will maintain its current alignment and Playoff Format for the 2012-13 season.
added 7:59pm, adding some rapid reaction from around the league to this below, so check back on a regular basis.
from Bruce Dowbiggin of the Globe and Mail,
...Fehr will also understand the weaknesses in a large-market ownership that played loyal last time only to get whacked by certain provisions in the collective agreement. He has seen the $2.1-billion (U.S.) in U.S. TV money and other revenue streams grow. Which could make him a man to dispassionately parlay with on issues – so long as he’s able to ride the membership tiger.
Owners are preparing lots of giveback demands to rile players and test Fehr’s mettle. There will be dark days when TSN analyst Bob McKenzie shrugs his shoulders and says, “Who knows?” But NHL commissioner Gary Bettman knows he has no mulligan with the public or media this time. He must get this collective agreement done on time or risk losing the 24/7 HBO and Winter Classic momentum – and tarnishing his own reputation.
For all these reasons and more, Usual Suspects says take it to the bank: There will be a collective agreement before its time in 2012.
from Daryl Reaugh at the Dallas Stars website,
• Blocking shots is the “obstruction” of the post lockout NHL. It’s killing creativity and offense.
• No NHLer has the right to complain about increased travel ahead of next years realignment. Chartered and catered first class planes, five star hotels, and door to stairway bus transit IS NOT what the millions of other business travelers ‘endure’. Nor is it anything close to what past generations of NHL players fought through.
• When the NHL and NHLPA get together and hammer out a new CBA (This is the final year of the existing agreement) I emplore them to change the practice of having agreements expire just prior to training camps, and instead switch to the NFL, NBA and I think MLB models where the agreement ends at the conclusion of their championships. Use the offseason to negotiate, not posture.
Pierre LeBrun of ESPN touches on numerous topics and I am just highlighting a few but make sure to follow the link to get more information…
• Sources confirmed earlier this past week to ESPN.com that the Tampa Bay Lightning and New York Rangers were among the four ‘No’ votes. I also believe the Montreal Canadiens may have voted against it but have not been able to confirm it. Was New Jersey in there as well?...
• What the GMs are officially supposed to debate in Boca Raton in March is what to do about the Final Four—go East-West or reseed based on points?
The early trend from my conversations with GMs is that East-West will be the more popular pick. But people can change their minds. We’ll see.
• ...players don’t always show concussion symptoms right after getting their brain crushed by a big hit. The mechanism in place is far from perfect. And I’m not sure I have the answer to make it better. You can’t start removing players from games on a hunch, can you?
Some of the NHL’s hot topics were up for discussion on Wednesday when NHL Players’ Association executive director Donald Fehr joined host James Cybulski on Cybulski and Company on TSN Radio 1050 Toronto.
In the days following the announcement of the league’s proposed realignment, Cybulski asked Fehr how the Players’ Association is reacting the news of a new four-conference format.
“As a general matter we think this needs to be negotiated with us. But hopefully we’ll be able to do that,” said Fehr.
“You want to look at how the travel affects players on all the teams, you want to look at the playoff picture and how that will be affected,” continued Fehr. “On a percentage basis, (we want to look at) whether it’s significantly more or less likely in a division or conference that somebody is going to be able to make the playoffs than others.”
Fehr explained that the players would also like some of the background that led to the decision shared with them.
continued at TSN…
The union’s input is still an important step in the realignment process.
“Realignment requires an agreement between the league and the NHLPA,” said Players’ Association spokesperson Jonathan Weatherdon. “We look forward to continuing our discussions with the league regarding this matter.”
That from a TSN story on realignment and Darren Dreger had tweeted it earlier too.
I tweeted earlier and asked if Donald Fehr would use this as a bargaining chip. I guess we will find out soon enough.
from Larry Brooks of the NY Post,
We Can’t tell you whether this is a case of hide-and-seek, but Slap Shots has learned from several sources that after exercising its right for the first time to audit select NHL clubs, the NHLPA believes it has discovered unreported revenues from last season.
This, in addition to a dispute over whether the $25 million Glendale, Ariz., paid the NHL to keep the Coyotes from absconding to Winnipeg should be considered hockey-related revenue, is what is holding up issuance of the escrow refunds to the players and checks to the owners who qualify for the second round of 2010-11 revenue sharing.
We’re told Washington and Nashville are among at least a handful of clubs that have been cited for failure to declare hockey-related revenue, with the matter now more likely than not to be decided in arbitration.
continued plus additional items including this…
Just what we need: Chris Pronger telling people how the game is meant to be played. Wonder if that includes the stomping and head shots.
from Helene Elliott of the LA Times,
NBA players have agreed to cut their share of basketball-related income from 57% to 52.5%, but owners want a 50-50 split. There’s nothing to stop the NHL, whose players got 57% of revenue last season, for asking for a reduction and threatening a loss of paychecks.
“As a union you treat a strike, which is the counterpart of a lockout, as a last resort and you hope that management treats a lockout the same way,” Fehr said by phone Monday.
“The objective fact is that in football and basketball this year and hockey the last time, in fact, management did not treat it as a last resort. Will it be different this time? We’ll know soon enough. But I don’t know yet.”
read on with some quotes from player agents…
from David Shoalts of the Globe and Mail,
I see the annual visor brouhaha came early this season. But everything else is in place:
A player (Chris Pronger) was clipped on the eye by a stick or puck. Check.
Some NHL general managers call for visors to be mandatory. Check.
Earnest, hand-wringing tomes in newspapers and on websites calling for same. Check.
Silence from the NHL Players’ Association or a murmur that the decision to wear a visor must be up to the player. Check.
Players ruminate about wearing visor, then say probably not. Can’t be bothered to wipe it off, don’t see as well, etc. Check.
The only thing that change in this debate are the names of the injured players. Actually, debate is the wrong term here. That would indicate some back-and-forth on the issue but there is none here. Everyone but the players wants visors to be worn. The players say it has to be our choice and a lot of us say no.
About Kukla's Korner Hockey
Paul Kukla founded Kukla’s Korner in 2005 and the site has since become the must-read site on the ‘net for all the latest happenings around the NHL.
From breaking news to in-depth stories around the league, KK Hockey is updated with fresh stories all day long and will bring you the latest news as quickly as possible.
Email Paul anytime at email@example.com