Kukla's Korner Hockey
from Larry Brooks of the NY Post,
We Can’t tell you whether this is a case of hide-and-seek, but Slap Shots has learned from several sources that after exercising its right for the first time to audit select NHL clubs, the NHLPA believes it has discovered unreported revenues from last season.
This, in addition to a dispute over whether the $25 million Glendale, Ariz., paid the NHL to keep the Coyotes from absconding to Winnipeg should be considered hockey-related revenue, is what is holding up issuance of the escrow refunds to the players and checks to the owners who qualify for the second round of 2010-11 revenue sharing.
We’re told Washington and Nashville are among at least a handful of clubs that have been cited for failure to declare hockey-related revenue, with the matter now more likely than not to be decided in arbitration.
continued plus additional items including this…
Just what we need: Chris Pronger telling people how the game is meant to be played. Wonder if that includes the stomping and head shots.
from Helene Elliott of the LA Times,
NBA players have agreed to cut their share of basketball-related income from 57% to 52.5%, but owners want a 50-50 split. There’s nothing to stop the NHL, whose players got 57% of revenue last season, for asking for a reduction and threatening a loss of paychecks.
“As a union you treat a strike, which is the counterpart of a lockout, as a last resort and you hope that management treats a lockout the same way,” Fehr said by phone Monday.
“The objective fact is that in football and basketball this year and hockey the last time, in fact, management did not treat it as a last resort. Will it be different this time? We’ll know soon enough. But I don’t know yet.”
read on with some quotes from player agents…
from David Shoalts of the Globe and Mail,
I see the annual visor brouhaha came early this season. But everything else is in place:
A player (Chris Pronger) was clipped on the eye by a stick or puck. Check.
Some NHL general managers call for visors to be mandatory. Check.
Earnest, hand-wringing tomes in newspapers and on websites calling for same. Check.
Silence from the NHL Players’ Association or a murmur that the decision to wear a visor must be up to the player. Check.
Players ruminate about wearing visor, then say probably not. Can’t be bothered to wipe it off, don’t see as well, etc. Check.
The only thing that change in this debate are the names of the injured players. Actually, debate is the wrong term here. That would indicate some back-and-forth on the issue but there is none here. Everyone but the players wants visors to be worn. The players say it has to be our choice and a lot of us say no.
via the tweets of Elliotte Friedman,
Agents received letters saying players’ escrow refund cheques are delayed…NHL and PA disagreeing about what qualifies as hockey revenue
One agent said he thought issue will be worked out…others not so sure
from the CP at MySask.com,
Donald Fehr has never been more excited about the start of a NHL season.
The executive director of the NHL Players’ Association came to hockey a little later in life and finally feels as though he knows the sport well enough to truly enjoy it. Even more importantly, he’s also looking forward to negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement with the league — the main task he was hired to perform.
Those discussions are scheduled to begin shortly after the all-star break at the end of January.
“That’ll give us several months to conduct the negotiations,” Fehr said in an interview with The Canadian Press. “I would like to believe we won’t need that long, but that much time will be available.”
Unlike many fretful fans who are worried about a repeat of the 2004-05 lockout, Fehr doesn’t see any reason for talks to go right up until the expiry of the current CBA on Sept. 15, 2012 — let alone beyond it.
from Larry Brooks of the NY Post,
In the NHL, a rising tide sinks small ships. The more revenue generated by major-market, money-printing machines such as Toronto, the Rangers, Montreal, Philadelphia and Vancouver—thus inflating the “gross”—the more money small-market clubs such as St. Louis, the Islanders, Carolina and Florida are mandated by league law to spend on payroll because of the patently preposterous cap floor.
Eliminating the floor should be Priority 1 for PA chief Donald Fehr next time around. This notion that Carolina’s payroll should somehow be directly related to Toronto’s revenue is not only absurd, it means the Hurricanes necessarily will lose more money, thus both increases escrow while fueling the self-fulfilling prophecy of increased losses by small-market clubs that sends Bettman into the labor battle with the hammer to demand give-backs because of rising losses by small-market teams.
The man is actually quite ingenious, come to think of it.
The floor is supposed to guarantee the holy grail of competitive balance, but it doesn’t. Buyouts go toward the floor. Entry Level bonuses that may never be and quite often never are attained, go toward the floor.
Forcing franchises that can’t afford it to commit a certain portion of their assets to payroll means they have less to invest in scouting and player development, areas fundamental to long-term success.
from Yvonne Zacharias of the Vancouver Sun,
For many NHL players, it’s over so quickly.
The cheering fades, the fat pay cheques stop coming and the last poker game is played on the back of the bus. So many nights on the road become a faded memory of a glory time when they were hockey heroes and super stars.
Now, they are just ordinary Joes, trying to figure out how to survive in a world that is foreign to them. After being coddled and cajoled for so many years, suddenly they are on their own. The fairy tale has come to a crashing halt.
For Tyson Nash, who spent most of his professional hockey-playing career with the St. Louis Blues and the Phoenix Coyotes, retirement from the game he loved was the hardest thing he ever had to deal with.
And he was one of the lucky ones. He had a hockey-related job waiting in the wings for him as a colour commentator for the Coyotes.
“I understand the players’ association being concerned about guys getting hurt and everything else, but I think the number one problem in this game right now is the head injuries and everybody needs to be in as soft shoulder pads can possibly be designed with still having some relative degree of safety.”
-Bob McKenzie of TSN. More from McKenzie by Nick Murray of The Brunswickan at the Canadian University Press newswire.
from Michael Russo of the Star Tribune,
The NHL and NHL Players’ Association will spend much of training camp reinforcing to players that there are resources available if they have problems with addiction or depression.
The offseason deaths of Derek Boogaard, Rick Rypien and Wade Belak also caused the parties to say they would examine each death and conduct an evaluation of existing programs and practices.
“I know they’re taking a beating right now, but they’ve had programs in place for years to help,” former Florida Panthers fighter Peter Worrell said. “I think a lot of it is the mentality that guys don’t want to take that leap, to make that phone call and say, ‘Look, I need help.’
“Hopefully now guys will say, ‘I don’t want this to be me.’”
It’s uncertain how widespread this problem is in the game, but it seems very unlikely that it’s isolated to a couple of players here or there. If (Ian) Laperrière is right and four or five guys per team are regular painkiller users, that’s nearly a fourth of all NHL players, an alarming number. You hope that is an overestimation, but you fear that it’s not. It is a major issue on which the NHL and NHLPA need to get a handle.
-Stu Hackel of The Red Light, where you can read much more on this topic.
About Kukla's Korner Hockey
Paul Kukla founded Kukla’s Korner in 2005 and the site has since become the must-read site on the ‘net for all the latest happenings around the NHL.
From breaking news to in-depth stories around the league, KK Hockey is updated with fresh stories all day long and will bring you the latest news as quickly as possible.
Email Paul anytime at email@example.com