Kukla's Korner Hockey
from Sarah Spain of ESPNW,
In 1995, Heather McDaniel made news all over the country as the first woman to officiate a men’s professional hockey game. For a number of years she worked minor league games in the Central Hockey League and the West Coast Hockey League.
In 1999, she got pregnant and stopped working pro hockey. There hasn’t been a female referee in the men’s professional game since.
There are roughly 2,800 registered female hockey officials in North America today, but just a few have worked the men’s game, and none at a higher level than juniors.
Times have changed since McDaniel roamed the ice. The women’s game has developed and flourished, giving accomplished female officials plenty of work without having to cross over to the men’s game.
from Brent Baburich at Penguins.com,
In 2009, he (Steve Waters) worked one of the USA Hockey 18U National Semi-Finals. In 2010, he was assigned the PA State High School AA Championship and last season he worked the Robert Morris-RIT game at the Island Sports Center that saw the Colonials bring in the largest home crowd in program history (1,200 fans). It would seem fair to say that Steve has a lot of hockey-related experience and memories. However, last month he was given an experience of a lifetime.
Steve was one of 20 officials invited to attend the NHL Exposure Camp in Toronto. This camp is designed to bring together people that have played at a high-level of hockey who are looking to pursue officiating more seriously now that they are done playing. The NHL holds the belief that this type of player will make for a good official as he or she should have developed a high “hockey IQ” during their time playing. Steve knew how lucky he was to be selected for this opportunity. He said, “It really meant a lot to be invited to this camp. I was told that there was an extremely large amount of applications for NHL Exposure this year and only 20 were selected. It was truly an honor.”
From Kerry Fraser at TSN:
There will be a third team on the ice as well. Their deep desire is to avoid becoming (or perceived as) a negative factor in the outcome of this game. Added pressure will certainly be on them to achieve this objective given the events to this point in the series. How they prepare themselves (& are prepared by Officiating/Hockey Ops) will go a long way to achieving a successful result in their performance. I say with the utmost confidence that all of us hope the officials will be a non factor in this final game. Let me share some thoughts on my preparation and occasional obstacles to overcome in memorable game 7’s that I worked.
Dealing with pressure is unique to every player and official; individual coping skills are developed along the way. Experience is often the best teacher when dealing with the internal combustion associated with the pressure of a Game 7. Sometimes you even have to incubate yourself from everything just so you don’t crawl out of your skin prior to the game.
The first time that I was thrust into a Game 7 pressure cooker was in the Battle of Quebec in 1985.
Stephen Walkom was mic’d up for game 3 of the SCF.
CBC’s John F. Molinaro talks to former NHL official Dan Marouelli, a veteran of four Stanley Cup Finals.
CBCSports.ca: Will the NHL talk to the officials before the game tonight?
Marouelli: Absolutely. Terry Gregson [the NHL’s director of officiating] and Kris King [series supervisor] will sit down with them for sure. The big message Terry and Kris will send to them is that the precedent has been set. There’s been a lack of discipline. It was a very aggressive hockey game last time. I would be looking to have them set the tone early in this hockey game. But they will also tell them not to overreact, and therein lies the fine line. Gregson and King will inform both coaches and both GMs of the direction the officials will go if things start to go south tonight.
CBCSports.ca: How do officials tread that fine line?
Marouelli: You need to establish your presence early, and normally that’s through some form of verbal communication with the coaches or role players who are out on the ice. Any time when I was involved in games like this, I was quick to verbalize to the bench and to any players that needed to be cautioned, and then make sure you follow through quickly when something happens.
and much more on the Rome/Horton situation, and other officiating issues
Kerry Fraser at TSN answered this email today…
I have always been curious as to why NHL referees do not have to give post-game interviews, especially in the playoffs. Since technically the NHL fans pay the referee’s salary from revenues generated by their ticket purchases, I often feel like we deserve an answer....
I couldn’t agree with you more about allowing media access to the officials for post-game comments. It is a position I have always held. At the very least a pool reporter should have access to the officials and then provide quotes to the rest of his colleagues in the media. Failing this, an official statement should be released by the vice-president of officiating, Terry Gregson or through the league’s media relations department.
The media has access to players and coaches following a game and they can be asked about calls that went against them. Those responses are always biased and often emotional. Why not gain a perspective from the person that made the decision? The media could then provide a more balanced report of an incident to you, the fan.
The truth is that most of the officials would welcome the opportunity to express their reasoning behind decisions on calls and non-calls; even if it was just an honest statement of, “I missed it - I blew the call.”
Great call by the linesman on the winning goal.
Many thought Kesler may have been offsides on the play, but as you can see, his skate tip was on the blue line when the puck entered the Boston zone.
from Kerry Fraser at TSN,
When it comes to diving or embellishment to draw penalties, do referees have access to game tapes or ‘diving reels’ of serial divers/embellishers? Does the league put out a memo on guys? Any former players you remember that were on a ‘naughty list’ to watch for?
The home team is responsible for providing both referees with their personal DVD copy of the broadcast (or in-house feed) following the conclusion of the game that they worked that night. The DVD, if utilized properly, can be a useful teaching tool if the ref analyzes his performance in an honest and objective fashion. This is often done on the airplane the next day unless an incident report has to be written following the game. The DVD can be used to confirm something that occurred in the game that night to assist in providing accuracy in the report writing process.
From Kerry Fraser at TSN:
An NHL referee typically travels between 80,000-120,000 miles per season (including pre-season and playoffs). After a five-day training camp, which includes medicals and a demanding fitness test on day one, we head off to work our exhibition assignments. Unlike a hockey team that resides in an NHL city, the officials’ home residences are scattered throughout North America. The league has attempted to accommodate requests made by officials who wish to relocate or they have moved young officials into hockey markets that would provide reduced travel costs through the assignment process. [...]
There is a concerted effort by NHL assigner Randy Hall to assign the referees to an equal number of regular season games in each NHL city over the course of their 73 game schedule. (Linesmen can work 75 games max.) Since each owner pays an equal share of the league officiating budget they want the top rated officials in their building as many times as the lower ranked officials. (I’ll leave the ranking to you.) In theory it also provides a sense of fairness.
Through expansion and attrition which brought new officials into the league, Bobby Clarke proposed that officials work in set crews and remain in one conference for at least half of the season. He felt this way the players could get to know them better and develop some sort of relationship. He felt that under the current system a team might see a referee or linesman in a game and not see that individual again for a month.
from James Mirtle of the Globe and Mail,
With the NHL warning every team in the past few days that it was going to start cracking down on dives and embellishments, Thornton picked up a minor for “unsportsmanlike conduct” while Johan Franzen went to the box for slashing.
For whatever reason, diving and embellishments have been epidemic in these playoffs, with players snapping their heads back or dropping to the ice at the first sign of contact. And often when you watch the plays in real-time, it’s difficult to see whether or not to tell if there’s an acting job or not, which makes life tough for the officials.
Even some players are calling on their teammates to cut it out.
Eight or nine years ago, there was a big crackdown on these sorts of plays, with the officials calling a diving penalty roughly once every 10 games during the regular season in 2002-03. The past four years, diving calls have dried up considerably, with only 32 made all year during the 2010-11 season.
About Kukla's Korner Hockey
Paul Kukla founded Kukla’s Korner in 2005 and the site has since become the must-read site on the ‘net for all the latest happenings around the NHL.
From breaking news to in-depth stories around the league, KK Hockey is updated with fresh stories all day long and will bring you the latest news as quickly as possible.
Email Paul anytime at email@example.com