Abel to Yzerman
by IwoCPO on 12/03/06 at 04:32 PM ET
Back to a semi-regular rate of posting tomorrow. For now, I'm mystified.
I get it. I know the Wings are taking it slowly, that keeping Hasek out of back-to-back games was the plan and they're sticking to it. I know that, and I see it.
But playing Hasek against St. Louis last Friday, sitting him against Bubba; then playing him against Minnesota, and sitting against the Sharks? Am I the only one who can't wrap his head around this?
I guess I'm slow, or overly critical. The difference between the Wild and Sharks isn't as great as that between St. Louis and Bubba, but a little advance scouting would have told us Minnesota was more likely to get off only 20 shots, while San Jose has an offense a bit tougher to contain. Also, playing the second game in two nights...doesn't it make sense to have your number 1 going to offset tired legs from the rest of the team?
Yes, the Hasek situation is a touchy one; best approached with caution. I'm not going to argue with Mike Babcock's refusal, at this point, to use him relatively sparingly. But, it seems to me that in a span of one week the Wings played arguably the two best teams in the West hamstrung from the opening faceoffs.
Filed in: | Abel to Yzerman | Permalink
Be the first to comment.
Add a Comment
Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.
Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.
Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.
Most Recent Blog Posts
About Abel to Yzerman
Welcome to Abel to Yzerman, a Red Wing blog since 1977. No other site on the internet has better-researched, fact-laden and better prepared discussions than A2Y. Re-phrase: we do little research, find facts and stats highly overrated and claim little to no preparation. There are 19 readers of A2Y. No more, no less. All of them, except maybe one, are juvenile in nature. Reminding them of that in the comment section will only encourage them to prove that. Your suggestions and critiques are welcome: email@example.com